about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/abi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-10-30compiler: Lift `rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi` to `rustc_abi::ExternAbi`Jubilee Young-362/+0
2024-10-22terminology: #[feature] *enables* a feature (instead of "declaring" or ↵Ralf Jung-1/+1
"activating" it)
2024-09-21add `C-cmse-nonsecure-entry` ABIFolkert de Vries-8/+15
2024-08-27ABI compat check: detect unadjusted ABI mismatchesRalf Jung-0/+2
2024-08-11Use assert_matches around the compilerMichael Goulet-1/+3
2024-07-11Remove extern "wasm" ABINikita Popov-15/+11
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked in #83788). As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679 and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19 would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv` ABI, which we do not want to do. It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue` feature. I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both `-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal C ABI, just with different different treatment in adjust_for_foreign_abi.
2024-04-29Remove `extern crate rustc_macros` from numerous crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
2024-02-25remove platform-intrinsics ABI; make SIMD intrinsics be regular intrinsicsRalf Jung-11/+4
2024-01-30Remove the `abi_amdgpu_kernel` featureclubby789-21/+14
2024-01-12allow system abi to be variadicbeepster4096-1/+2
2023-11-08rustc_target: move file for uniformityDavid Wood-0/+341
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
2023-08-08feat: `riscv-interrupt-{m,s}` calling conventionsSeth Pellegrino-3/+3
Similar to prior support added for the mips430, avr, and x86 targets this change implements the rough equivalent of clang's [`__attribute__((interrupt))`][clang-attr] for riscv targets, enabling e.g. ```rust static mut CNT: usize = 0; pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { unsafe { CNT += 1; } } ``` to produce highly effective assembly like: ```asm pub extern "riscv-interrupt-m" fn isr_m() { 420003a0: 1141 addi sp,sp,-16 unsafe { CNT += 1; 420003a2: c62a sw a0,12(sp) 420003a4: c42e sw a1,8(sp) 420003a6: 3fc80537 lui a0,0x3fc80 420003aa: 63c52583 lw a1,1596(a0) # 3fc8063c <_ZN12esp_riscv_rt3CNT17hcec3e3a214887d53E.0> 420003ae: 0585 addi a1,a1,1 420003b0: 62b52e23 sw a1,1596(a0) } } 420003b4: 4532 lw a0,12(sp) 420003b6: 45a2 lw a1,8(sp) 420003b8: 0141 addi sp,sp,16 420003ba: 30200073 mret ``` (disassembly via `riscv64-unknown-elf-objdump -C -S --disassemble ./esp32c3-hal/target/riscv32imc-unknown-none-elf/release/examples/gpio_interrupt`) This outcome is superior to hand-coded interrupt routines which, lacking visibility into any non-assembly body of the interrupt handler, have to be very conservative and save the [entire CPU state to the stack frame][full-frame-save]. By instead asking LLVM to only save the registers that it uses, we defer the decision to the tool with the best context: it can more accurately account for the cost of spills if it knows that every additional register used is already at the cost of an implicit spill. At the LLVM level, this is apparently [implemented by] marking every register as "[callee-save]," matching the semantics of an interrupt handler nicely (it has to leave the CPU state just as it found it after its `{m|s}ret`). This approach is not suitable for every interrupt handler, as it makes no attempt to e.g. save the state in a user-accessible stack frame. For a full discussion of those challenges and tradeoffs, please refer to [the interrupt calling conventions RFC][rfc]. Inside rustc, this implementation differs from prior art because LLVM does not expose the "all-saved" function flavor as a calling convention directly, instead preferring to use an attribute that allows for differentiating between "machine-mode" and "superivsor-mode" interrupts. Finally, some effort has been made to guide those who may not yet be aware of the differences between machine-mode and supervisor-mode interrupts as to why no `riscv-interrupt` calling convention is exposed through rustc, and similarly for why `riscv-interrupt-u` makes no appearance (as it would complicate future LLVM upgrades). [clang-attr]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#interrupt-risc-v [full-frame-save]: https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-riscv-rt/blob/9281af2ecffe13e40992917316f36920c26acaf3/src/lib.rs#L440-L469 [implemented by]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/b7fb2a3fec7c187d58a6d338ab512d9173bca987/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVRegisterInfo.cpp#L61-L67 [callee-save]: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/973f1fe7a8591c7af148e573491ab68cc15b6ecf/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVCallingConv.td#L30-L37 [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3246
2020-08-30mv compiler to compiler/mark-0/+27