| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Implement `#[derive(From)]`
Implements the `#[derive(From)]` feature ([tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144889), [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3809)).
It allows deriving the `From` impl on structs and tuple structs with exactly one field. Some implementation notes:
- I wasn't exactly sure which spans to use in the derive generating code, so I just used `span` everywhere. I don't know if it's the Right Thing To Do. In particular the errors when `#[derive(From)]` is used on a struct with an unsized field are weirdly duplicated.
- I had to solve an import stability problem, where if I just added the unstable `macro From` to `core::convert`, previously working code like `use std::convert::From` would suddenly require an unstable feature gate, because rustc would think that you're trying to import the unstable macro. `@petrochenkov` suggested that I add the macro the the core prelude instead. This has worked well, although it only works in edition 2021+. Not sure if I botched the prelude somehow and it should live elsewhere (?).
- I had to add `Ty::AstTy`, because the `from` function receives an argument with the type of the single field, and the existing variants of the `Ty` enum couldn't represent an arbitrary type.
|
|
|
|
Implement autodiff using intrinsics
This PR aims to move autodiff logic to `autodiff` intrinsic. Allowing us to delete a great part of our frontend code and overall, simplify the compilation pipeline of autodiff functions.
|
|
|
|
When operating on expressions, `cfg_select!` can now handle expressions
without braces. (It still requires braces for other things, such as
items.)
Expand the test coverage and documentation accordingly.
|
|
Improve formatting of doc code blocks
We don't currently apply automatic formatting to doc comment code blocks. As a
result, it has built up various idiosyncracies, which make such automatic
formatting difficult. Some of those idiosyncracies also make things harder for
human readers or other tools.
This PR makes a few improvements to doc code formatting, in the hopes of making
future automatic formatting easier, as well as in many cases providing net
readability improvements.
I would suggest reading each commit separately, as each commit contains one
class of changes.
|
|
Because doc code does not get automatically formatted, some doc code has
creative placements of comments that automatic formatting can't handle.
Reformat those comments to make the resulting code support standard Rust
formatting without breaking; this is generally an improvement to
readability as well.
Some comments are not indented to the prevailing indent, and are instead
aligned under some bit of code. Indent them to the prevailing indent,
and put spaces *inside* the comments to align them with code.
Some comments span several lines of code (which aren't the line the
comment is about) and expect alignment. Reformat them into one comment
not broken up by unrelated intervening code.
Some comments are placed on the same line as an opening brace, placing
them effectively inside the subsequent block, such that formatting would
typically format them like a line of that block. Move those comments to
attach them to what they apply to.
Some comments are placed on the same line as a one-line braced block,
effectively attaching them to the closing brace, even though they're
about the code inside the block. Reformat to make sure the comment will
stay on the same line as the code it's commenting.
|
|
|
|
Also make it *only* usable on nightly
|
|
and make internal terminology consistent
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
|
|
|
|
Remove the deprecated unstable `concat_idents!` macro
In [rust-lang/rust#137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate
and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The
deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version
1.90).
This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}`
metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the
limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably
available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature.
History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011
when it was introduced with 513276e595f8 ("Add #concat_idents[] and
#ident_to_str[]"). The syntax looks a bit different but it still works
about the same:
let asdf_fdsa = "<.<";
assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<");
assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction]
== "use_mention_distinction");
(That test existed from introduction until its removal here.)
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599
[rust-lang/rust#137653]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
[`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
|
|
In [137653], the lang and libs-API teams did a joint FCP to deprecate
and eventually remove the long-unstable `concat_idents!` macro. The
deprecation is landing in 1.88, so do the removal here (target version
1.90).
This macro has been superseded by the more recent `${concat(...)}`
metavariable expression language feature, which avoids some of the
limitations of `concat_idents!`. The metavar expression is unstably
available under the [`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] feature.
History is mildly interesting here: `concat_idents!` goes back to 2011
when it was introduced with 513276e595f8 ("Add #concat_idents[] and
about the same:
let asdf_fdsa = "<.<";
assert(#concat_idents[asd,f_f,dsa] == "<.<");
assert(#ident_to_str[use_mention_distinction]
== "use_mention_distinction");
(That test existed from introduction until its removal here.)
Closes: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29599
[137653]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137653
[`macro_metavar_expr_concat`]: https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
|
|
|
|
This takes the current behavior of `file!` and documents it so it is
safe to make assumptions about.
For example, Cargo could provide a `CARGO_RUSTC_CURRENT_DIR` as a base
path for `file!`.
Example use cases
- Being able to look up test assets relative to the current file
([example](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/b9026bf654d7fac283465e58b8b76742244ef07d/tests/testsuite/cargo_add/add_basic/mod.rs#L34))
- Inline snapshotting libraries being able to update Rust source code
([example](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/b9026bf654d7fac283465e58b8b76742244ef07d/tests/testsuite/alt_registry.rs#L36-L45))
T-libs-api discussed two solutions
- `file_absolute!`:
- Has less meaning in other build tools like buck2
- Bakes in the assumption that a full path is available (e.g. with
trim-paths)
- Specifying `file!`s behavior (this PR):
- Leaves it to the user to deal with trim-paths
- Even though `file!` is currently unspecified, changing it would
likely have too large of an impact on the ecosystem at this time.
A future possibility is that rustc could have a flag that controls
modifies the base path used for `file!`.
That seems purely additive with specifying the behavior and we do not
want to block on it.
It would also likely be too disruptive for Cargo users (as mentioned).
However, we tried to keep this in mind when specifying the behavior.
|
|
|
|
Split `autodiff` into `autodiff_forward` and `autodiff_reverse`
This PR splits `#[autodiff]` macro so `#[autodiff(df, Reverse, args)]` would become `#[autodiff_reverse(df, args)]` and `#[autodiff(df, Forward, args)]` would become `#[autodiff_forwad(df, args)]`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At [1] it was pointed out that `cfg_match!` syntax does not actually
align well with match syntax, which is a possible source of confusion.
The comment points out that usage is instead more similar to ecosystem
`select!` macros. Rename `cfg_match!` to `cfg_select!` to match this.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585#issuecomment-2346307605
|
|
Pending fix.
```
error: cannot find a built-in macro with name `autodiff_forward`
--> library\core\src\macros\mod.rs:1542:5
|
1542 | / pub macro autodiff_forward($item:item) {
1543 | | /* compiler built-in */
1544 | | }
| |_____^
error: cannot find a built-in macro with name `autodiff_reverse`
--> library\core\src\macros\mod.rs:1549:5
|
1549 | / pub macro autodiff_reverse($item:item) {
1550 | | /* compiler built-in */
1551 | | }
| |_____^
error: could not compile `core` (lib) due to 2 previous errors
```
|
|
de-stabilize bench attribute
This has been soft-unstable since forever (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64066), and shown in future-compat reports since Rust 1.77 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116274).
The feature covering `bench` itself is tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50297, which has been closed despite still having active feature gates referencing it.
Cc `@rust-lang/libs-api`
|
|
chore: remove redundant words in comment
remove redundant words in comment
|
|
`concat_idents` has been around unstably for a long time, but there is
now a better (but still unstable) way to join identifiers using
`${concat(...)}` syntax with `macro_metavar_expr_concat`. This resolves
a lot of the problems with `concat_idents` and is on a better track
toward stabilization, so there is no need to keep both versions around.
`concat_idents!` still has a lot of use in the ecosystem so deprecate it
before removing, as discussed in [1].
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124225
[1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/219381-t-libs/topic/Removing.20.60concat_idents.60
|
|
Bump boostrap compiler to new beta
try-job: `*msvc*`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: pudongair <744355276@qq.com>
|
|
|
|
Remove `#[cfg(not(test))]` gates in `core`
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from conflicting with each other.
|
|
|
|
These gates are unnecessary now that unit tests for `core` are in a
separate package, `coretests`, instead of in the same files as the
source code. They previously prevented the two `core` versions from
conflicting with each other.
|
|
|
|
This has now been approved as a language feature and no longer needs
a `rustc_` prefix.
Also change the `contracts` feature to be marked as incomplete and
`contracts_internals` as internal.
|
|
The extended syntax for function signature that includes contract clauses
should never be user exposed versus the interface we want to ship
externally eventually.
|
|
Check ensures on early return due to Try / Yeet
Expand these two expressions to include a call to contract checking
|
|
r=oli-obk
Remove rustc_encodable_decodable feature
This has been shown in future-compat reports since Rust 1.79 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116016), released June 2024. Let's see if crater still finds any issues.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134301.
Cc ``@rust-lang/libs-api``
|
|
|
|
[cfg_match] Adjust syntax
A year has passed since the creation of #115585 and the feature, as expected, is not moving forward. Let's change that.
This PR proposes changing the arm's syntax from `cfg(SOME_CONDITION) => { ... }` to `SOME_CODITION => {}`.
```rust
match_cfg! {
unix => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
target_pointer_width = "32" => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
Why? Because after several manual migrations in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116342 it became clear, at least for me, that `cfg` prefixes are unnecessary, verbose and redundant.
Again, everything is just a proposal to move things forward. If the shown syntax isn't ideal, feel free to close this PR or suggest other alternatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=wesleywiser"
This reverts commit 1d35638dc38dbfbf1cc2a9823135dfcf3c650169, reversing
changes made to f23a80a4c2fbca593b64e70f5970368824b4c5e9.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also move internal const_panic helpers to a better location
|
|
in const
|
