| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Autogenerate stubs and SUMMARY.md in the unstable book
Removes a speed bump in compiler development by autogenerating stubs for features in the unstable book. See #42454 for discussion.
The PR contains three commits, separated in order to make review easy:
* The first commit converts the tidy tool from a binary crate to a crate that contains both a library and a binary. In the second commit, we'll use the tidy library
* The second and main commit introduces autogeneration of SUMMARY.md and feature stub files
* The third commit turns off the tidy lint that checks for features without a stub, and removes the stub files. A separate commit due to the large number of files touched
Members of the doc team who wish to document some features can either do this (where `$rustsrc` is the root of the rust repo git checkout):
1. cd to `$rustsrc/src/tools/unstable-book-gen` and then do `cargo run $rustsrc/src $rustsrc/src/doc/unstable-book` to put the stubs into the unstable book
2. cd to `$rustsrc` and run `git ls-files --others --exclude-standard` to list the newly added stubs
3. choose a file to edit, then `git add` it and `git commit`
4. afterwards, remove all changes by the tool by doing `git --reset hard` and `git clean -f`
Or they can do this:
1. remove the comment marker in `src/tools/tidy/src/unstable_book.rs` line 122
2. run `./x.py test src/tools/tidy` to list the unstable features which only have stubs
3. revert the change in 1
3. document one of the chosen unstable features
The changes done by this PR also allow for further development:
* tidy obtains information about tracking issues. We can now forbid differing tracking issues between differing `#![unstable]` annotations. I haven't done this but plan to in a future PR
* we now have a general framework for generating stuff for the unstable book at build time. Further changes can autogenerate a list of the API a given library feature exposes.
The old way to simply click through the documentation after it has been uploaded to rust-lang.org works as well.
r? @nagisa
Fixes #42454
|
|
|
|
Otherwise the build fails, when running tests but not building docs, e.g.:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rustc&arch=ppc64el&ver=1.17.0%2Bdfsg2-3&stamp=1497403375&raw=0
|
|
|
|
|
|
This option forwards to each `cargo test` invocation, and applies the
same logic across all test steps to keep going after failures. At the
end, a brief summary line reports how many commands failed, if any.
Note that if a test program fails to even start at all, or if an
auxiliary build command related to testing fails, these are still left
to stop everything right away.
Fixes #40219.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
only create source tarball for the Dist subcommand
mark install rule as default for Kind::Install
split install-docs
split install-std
factor out empty_dir handling
split install-cargo
split install-analysis
split install-src
rework install-rustc
properly handle cross-compilation setups for install
use pkgname in install
split plain source tarball generation from rust-src dist
document src-tarball in config.toml.exmaple
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
Introduce a new Installer object that hold a reference to all the
configured paths for installation
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We've got a freshly minted beta compiler, let's update to use that on nightly!
This has a few other changes associated with it as well
* A bump to the rustc version number (to 1.19.0)
* Movement of the `cargo` and `rls` submodules to their "proper" location in
`src/tools/{cargo,rls}`. Now that Cargo workspaces support the `exclude`
option this can work.
* Updates of the `cargo` and `rls` submodules to their master branches.
* Tweak to the `src/stage0.txt` format to be more amenable for Cargo version
numbers. On the beta channel Cargo will bootstrap from a different version
than rustc (e.g. the version numbers are different), so we need different
configuration for this.
* Addition of `dev` as a readable key in the `src/stage0.txt` format. If present
then stage0 compilers are downloaded from `dev-static.rust-lang.org` instead
of `static.rust-lang.org`. This is added to accomodate our updated release
process with Travis and AppVeyor.
|
|
rustbuild improvements
Properly hook up cargo and rls in the build phase, and install them, when extended build is enabled.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
Currently our slowest test suite on android, run-pass, takes over 5 times longer
than the x86_64 component (~400 -> ~2200s). Typically QEMU emulation does indeed
add overhead, but not 5x for this kind of workload. One of the slowest parts of
the Android process is that *compilation* happens serially. Tests themselves
need to run single-threaded on the emulator (due to how the test harness works)
and this forces the compiles themselves to be single threaded.
Now Travis gives us more than one core per machine, so it'd be much better if we
could take advantage of them! The emulator itself is still fundamentally
single-threaded, but we should see a nice speedup by sending binaries for it to
run much more quickly.
It turns out that we've already got all the tools to do this in-tree. The
qemu-test-{server,client} that are in use for the ARM Linux testing are a
perfect match for the Android emulator. This commit migrates the custom adb
management code in compiletest/rustbuild to the same qemu-test-{server,client}
implementation that ARM Linux uses.
This allows us to lift the parallelism restriction on the compiletest test
suites, namely run-pass. Consequently although we'll still basically run the
tests themselves in single threaded mode we'll be able to compile all of them in
parallel, keeping the pipeline much more full and using more cores for the work
at hand. Additionally the architecture here should be a bit speedier as it
should have less overhead than adb which is a whole new process on both the host
and the emulator!
Locally on an 8 core machine I've seen the run-pass test suite speed up from
taking nearly an hour to only taking 6 minutes. I don't think we'll see quite a
drastic speedup on Travis but I'm hoping this change can place the Android tests
well below 2 hours instead of just above 2 hours.
Because the client/server here are now repurposed for more than just QEMU,
they've been renamed to `remote-test-{server,client}`.
Note that this PR does not currently modify how debuginfo tests are executed on
Android. While parallelizable it wouldn't be quite as easy, so that's left to
another day. Thankfully that test suite is much smaller than the run-pass test
suite.
As a final fix I discovered that the ARM and Android test suites were actually
running all library unit tests (e.g. stdtest, coretest, etc) twice. I've
corrected that to only run tests once which should also give a nice boost in
overall cycle time here.
|
|
Build them directly in the `./x.py build` phase, don't wait for
`./x.py dist`
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>
|
|
Previously the `cargotest` suite would run some arbitrary revision of Cargo's
test suite, but now that we're bundling it in tree we should be running the
Cargo submodule's test suite instead.
|
|
Use the existing path when removing the prefix fails
This allows the use of out-of-tree paths to be specified. I found this while trying to build with a modified version of `rls-data`, which is currently pointing to a version on crates.io.
cc @alexcrichton
Also, it wasn't clear if I needed to add a test for this (or how). I didn't see any tests that took paths into consideration.
|
|
|
|
This commit knocks out a longstanding FIXME in rustbuild which should correctly
recompile stage0 compiletest and such whenever libstd itself changes. The
solution implemented here was to implement a notion of "order only" dependencies
and then add a new dependency stage for clearing out the tools dir, using
order-only deps to ensure that it happens correctly.
The dependency drawing for tools is a bit wonky now but I think this'll get the
job done.
Closes #39396
|
|
This commit enables the `rust-analysis` package to be produced for all targets
that are part of the `dist-*` suite of docker images on Travis. Currently
these packages are showing up with `available = false` in the
`channel-rust-nightly.toml` manifest where we'd prefer to have them show up for
all targets.
Unfortunately rustup isn't handling the `available = false` section well right
now, so this should also inadvertently fix the nightly regression.
|
|
* Use the right version when building combined installer
* Update dependencies of rls as it depends on rustc and plugins
* Fix build-manifest and the versions it uses for the rls
|
|
|
|
out-of-tree paths to be specified
|
|
- No more manual args manipulation -- getopts used for everything.
As a result, options can be in any position, now, even before the
subcommand.
- The additional options for test, bench, and dist now appear in the
help output.
- No more single-letter variable bindings used internally for large
scopes.
- Don't output the time measurement when just invoking 'x.py'
- Logic is now much more linear. We build strings up, and then print
them.
|
|
|
|
Use the same step names as the actual build.
|
|
* Make sure std docs are generated before compiler docs so rustdoc uses
relative links.
* Don't document the rustc and rustdoc binary crates as they overwrite
the real rustc and rustdoc crates.
|
|
rustbuild: Build documentation for `proc_macro`
This commit fixes #38749 by building documentation for the `proc_macro` crate by
default for configured hosts. Unfortunately did not turn out to be a trivial
fix. Currently rustbuild generates documentation into multiple locations: one
for std, one for test, and one for rustc. The initial fix for this issue simply
actually executed `cargo doc -p proc_macro` which was otherwise completely
elided before.
Unfortunately rustbuild was the left to merge two documentation trees together.
One for the standard library and one for the rustc tree (which only had docs for
the `proc_macro` crate). Rustdoc itself knows how to merge documentation files
(specifically around search indexes, etc) but rustbuild was unaware of this, so
an initial fix ended up destroying the sidebar and the search bar from the
libstd docs.
To solve this issue the method of documentation has been tweaked slightly in
rustbuild. The build system will not use symlinks (or directory junctions on
Windows) to generate all documentation into the same location initially. This'll
rely on rustdoc's logic to weave together all the output and ensure that it ends
up all consistent.
Closes #38749
|
|
This causes problems when first cloning and bootstrapping the repository
unfortunately, so let's ensure that Cargo sticks around in its own workspace.
Because Cargo is a submodule it's not available by default on the inital clone
of the rust-lang/rust repository. Normally it's the responsibility of the
rustbuild to take care of this, but unfortunately to build rustbuild itself we
need to resolve the workspace conflicts.
To deal with this we'll just have to ensure that all submodules are in their own
workspace, which sort of makes sense anyway as updates to dependencies as
bugfixes to Cargo should go to rust-lang/cargo instead of rust-lang/rust. In any
case this commit removes Cargo from the global workspace which should resolve
the issues that we've been seeing.
To actually perform this the `cargo` submodule has been moved to the top
directory to ensure it's outside the scope of `src/Cargo.toml` as a workspace.
|
|
This commit fixes #38749 by building documentation for the `proc_macro` crate by
default for configured hosts. Unfortunately did not turn out to be a trivial
fix. Currently rustbuild generates documentation into multiple locations: one
for std, one for test, and one for rustc. The initial fix for this issue simply
actually executed `cargo doc -p proc_macro` which was otherwise completely
elided before.
Unfortunately rustbuild was the left to merge two documentation trees together.
One for the standard library and one for the rustc tree (which only had docs for
the `proc_macro` crate). Rustdoc itself knows how to merge documentation files
(specifically around search indexes, etc) but rustbuild was unaware of this, so
an initial fix ended up destroying the sidebar and the search bar from the
libstd docs.
To solve this issue the method of documentation has been tweaked slightly in
rustbuild. The build system will not use symlinks (or directory junctions on
Windows) to generate all documentation into the same location initially. This'll
rely on rustdoc's logic to weave together all the output and ensure that it ends
up all consistent.
Closes #38749
|
|
|
|
rustbuild: Add support for compiling Cargo
This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release
process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and
repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the
rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here.
The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components,
such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of
Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway.
The process for release Cargo will now look like:
* The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a
Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release
* Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's
master branch
* When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and
the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to
this exact revision.
* When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and
then make a stable release.
Backports to Cargo will look like:
* Send a PR to cargo's master branch
* Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0)
* Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule
* Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule
For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release
would look like:
* Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools`
* Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler,
likely mirroring what Cargo does.
* Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output
to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo
does.
* Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo`
* Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
|
|
This commit adds support to rustbuild for compiling Cargo as part of the release
process. Previously rustbuild would simply download a Cargo snapshot and
repackage it. With this change we should be able to turn off artifacts from the
rust-lang/cargo repository and purely rely on the artifacts Cargo produces here.
The infrastructure added here is intended to be extensible to other components,
such as the RLS. It won't exactly be a one-line addition, but the addition of
Cargo didn't require too much hooplah anyway.
The process for release Cargo will now look like:
* The rust-lang/rust repository has a Cargo submodule which is used to build a
Cargo to pair with the rust-lang/rust release
* Periodically we'll update the cargo submodule as necessary on rust-lang/rust's
master branch
* When branching beta we'll create a new branch of Cargo (as we do today), and
the first commit to the beta branch will be to update the Cargo submodule to
this exact revision.
* When branching stable, we'll ensure that the Cargo submodule is updated and
then make a stable release.
Backports to Cargo will look like:
* Send a PR to cargo's master branch
* Send a PR to cargo's release branch (e.g. rust-1.16.0)
* Send a PR to rust-lang/rust's beta branch updating the submodule
* Eventually send a PR to rust-lang/rust's master branch updating the submodule
For reference, the process to add a new component to the rust-lang/rust release
would look like:
* Add `$foo` as a submodule in `src/tools`
* Add a `tool-$foo` step which compiles `$foo` with the specified compiler,
likely mirroring what Cargo does.
* Add a `dist-$foo` step which uses `src/tools/$foo` and the `tool-$foo` output
to create a rust-installer package for `$foo` likely mirroring what Cargo
does.
* Update the `dist-extended` step with a new dependency on `dist-$foo`
* Update `src/tools/build-manifest` for the new component.
|
|
|
|
|
|
test: Verify all sysroot crates are unstable
As we continue to add more crates to the compiler and use them to implement
various features we want to be sure we're not accidentally expanding the API
surface area of the compiler! To that end this commit adds a new `run-make` test
which will attempt to `extern crate foo` all crates in the sysroot, verifying
that they're all unstable.
This commit discovered that the `std_shim` and `test_shim` crates were
accidentally stable and fixes the situation by deleting those shims. The shims
are no longer necessary due to changes in Cargo that have happened since they
were originally incepted.
|
|
part of #39588
|
|
As we continue to add more crates to the compiler and use them to implement
various features we want to be sure we're not accidentally expanding the API
surface area of the compiler! To that end this commit adds a new `run-make` test
which will attempt to `extern crate foo` all crates in the sysroot, verifying
that they're all unstable.
This commit discovered that the `std_shim` and `test_shim` crates were
accidentally stable and fixes the situation by deleting those shims. The shims
are no longer necessary due to changes in Cargo that have happened since they
were originally incepted.
|
|
This only really moves the files, there's a lot more work coming
in the next commits.
Part of #39588.
|
|
This commit adds support to the build system to execute test suites that cannot
run natively but can instead run inside of a QEMU emulator. A proof-of-concept
builder was added for the `arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf` target to show off how
this might work.
In general the architecture is to have a server running inside of the emulator
which a local client connects to. The protocol between the server/client
supports compiling tests on the host and running them on the target inside the
emulator.
Closes #33114
|
