| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Be a bit more explicit asserting over the vec rather than the len
|
|
|
|
This is similar to `NonNull::cast`.
Compared to the `as` operator (which has a wide range of meanings
depending on the input and output types), a call to this method:
* Can only go from a raw pointer to a raw pointer
* Cannot change the pointer’s `const`ness
… even when the pointed types are inferred based on context.
|
|
This reverts commit 77bd4dc65406ba3cedbc779e6f6280868231912e.
Issue #42778 was formerly easy to reproduce on two big-endian targets,
`powerpc64` and `s390x`, so we disabled SIMD on this function for all
big-endian targets as a workaround.
I have re-tested this code on `powerpc64` and `s390x`, each with the
bundled LLVM 8 and with external LLVM 7 and LLVM 6, and the problems no
longer appear. So it seems safe to remove this workaround, although I'm
still a little uncomfortable that we never found a root-cause...
|
|
... on different platforms.
Official rustdoc of
[`usize::to_le_bytes`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.usize.html#method.to_le_bytes)
displays signature
```
pub fn to_ne_bytes(self) -> [u8; 8]
```
which might be misleading: this function returns 4 bytes on 32-bit
systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize str::as_mut_ptr
Closes #58215
|
|
Option::flatten
This PR makes this possible.
```rust
assert_eq!(Some(6), Some(Some(6)).flatten());
assert_eq!(Some(6), Some(Some(6)).into());
```
|
|
Fix equivalent string in escape_default docs
This newline should be escaped.
|
|
|
|
const-stabilize: std::mem::needs_drop
Closes #51929
r? @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
|
|
... but leave the old names in there for backwards compatibility.
|
|
|
|
squashed commit
|
|
|
|
Closes #44488
|
|
Add a tidy check for files with over 3,000 lines
Files with a large number of lines can cause issues in GitHub (e.g. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60015) and also tend to be indicative of opportunities to refactor into less monolithic structures.
This adds a new check to tidy to warn against files that have more than 3,000 lines, as suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60015#issuecomment-483868594. (This number was chosen fairly arbitrarily as a reasonable indicator of size.) This check can be ignored with `// ignore-tidy-filelength`.
Existing files with greater than 3,000 lines currently ignore the check, but this helps us spot when files are getting too large. (We might try to split up all files larger than this in the future, as in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60015).
|
|
Add Pin::{into_inner,into_inner_unchecked}
These functions are useful for unsafe code that needs to temporarily pull smart pointers out of the `Pin`, e.g. [the change that inspired them](https://github.com/Nemo157/futures-rs/commit/b4361780faf764c7cb046ed75f863a6fcfd44800#diff-1a4e0ba4d1b539412ca576411ec6c7c2R258) is taking a `Pin<Box<dyn Future>>`, turning it into a `*mut dyn Future` via `Box::into_raw(unsafe { Pin::into_inner_unchecked(pin) })` then later dropping this via `drop(Pin::from(Box::from_raw(ptr)))`. This can be accomplished today via `{ let ptr = unsafe { Pin::get_unchecked_mut(pin.as_mut()) } as *mut dyn Future; mem::forget(pin); ptr }`, but this is far more complicated and loses out on the symmetry of using `Box::into_raw` and `Box::from_raw`.
I'll extend the documentation on what guarantees `into_inner_unchecked` needs to uphold once I get some feedback on whether this API is wanted or not.
r? @withoutboats
|
|
|
|
Implement saturating_abs() and saturating_neg() functions for signed integer types
Similar to wrapping_abs() / wrapping_neg() functions but saturating at the numeric bounds instead of wrapping around. Complements the existing set of functions with saturation mechanics.
cc #59983
|
|
|
|
Similar to wrapping_abs() / wrapping_neg() functions but saturating at
the numeric bounds instead of wrapping around. Complements the existing
set of functions with saturation mechanics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warn on unused results for operation methods on nums
From a suggestion by @llogiq
Adds a `#[must_use]` attribute to operation methods on integers that take self by value as the first operand and another value as the second. It makes it clear that these methods return the result of the operation instead of mutating `self`, which is the source of a rather embarrassing bug I had in a codebase of mine recently...
As an example:
```rust
struct Int {
value: i64,
}
impl Int {
fn add(&mut self, other: i64) {
self.value.wrapping_add(other);
}
}
```
Will produce a warning like:
```
warning: unused return value of `core::num::<impl i64>::wrapping_add` that must be used
--> src/main.rs:7:7
|
7 | self.value.wrapping_add(other);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: #[warn(unused_must_use)] on by default
= note: this returns the result of the operation, without modifying the original
```
If this is something we're on board with, we could do something similar for `f32` and `f64` too. There are probably other methods on integers that make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deny rust_2018_idioms globally
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/58099#issuecomment-484921194
|
|
|
|
DoubleEndedIterators.
r?Manishearth
|
|
|
|
Fixed outdated reference to `waker` argument; now futures are passed a
`Context`, from which one can obtain a `waker`.
Cleaned up explanation of what happens when you call `poll` on a completed
future. It doesn't make sense to say that `poll` implementations can't cause
memory unsafety; no safe function is ever allowed to cause memory unsafety, so
why mention it here? It seems like the intent is to say that the `Future` trait
doesn't say what the consequences of excess polls will be, and they might be
bad; but that the usual constraints that Rust imposes on any non-`unsafe`
function still apply. It's also oddly specific to say 'memory corruption'
instead of just 'undefined behavior'; UB is a bit jargony, so the text should
provide examples.
|
|
|
|
libcore: deny `elided_lifetimes_in_paths`
r? @varkor
|
|
Fix small errors in docs for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
The documentation for `rchunks_exact` said it started at the beginning
of the slice, bit it actually starts at the end of the slice.
In addition, there were a couple of "of the slice of the slice"
duplicate phrases going on for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
This fixes #60068.
|
|
implement specialized nth_back() for Bytes, Fuse and Enumerate
Hi,
After my first PR has been successfully merged, here is my second pull request :-)
Also this PR contains some specializations for the problem discussed in #54054.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The documentation for `rchunks_exact` said it started at the beginning
of the slice, bit it actually starts at the end of the slice.
In addition, there were a couple of "of the slice of the slice"
duplicate phrases going on for `rchunks_exact` and `rchunks_exact_mut`.
This fixes #60068.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix the max value of usize on 16-bit platforms
|
