| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
This PR implements [RFC 1192](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1192-inclusive-ranges.md), which is triple-dot syntax for inclusive range expressions. The new stuff is behind two feature gates (one for the syntax and one for the std::ops types). This replaces the deprecated functionality in std::iter. Along the way I simplified the desugaring for all ranges.
This is my first contribution to rust which changes more than one character outside of a test or comment, so please review carefully! Some of the individual commit messages have more of my notes. Also thanks for putting up with my dumb questions in #rust-internals.
- For implementing `std::ops::RangeInclusive`, I took @Stebalien's suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1192#issuecomment-137864421. It seemed to me to make the implementation easier and increase type safety. If that stands, the RFC should be amended to avoid confusion.
- I also kind of like @glaebhoerl's [idea](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1254#issuecomment-147815299), which is unified inclusive/exclusive range syntax something like `x>..=y`. We can experiment with this while everything is behind a feature gate.
- There are a couple of FIXMEs left (see the last commit). I didn't know what to do about `RangeArgument` and I haven't added `Index` impls yet. Those should be discussed/finished before merging.
cc @Gankro since you [complained](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xkfro/what_happened_to_inclusive_ranges/cy5j0yq)
cc #27777 #30877 rust-lang/rust#1192 rust-lang/rfcs#1254
relevant to #28237 (tracking issue)
|
|
|
|
A whole bunch of stuff gets folded into struct handling! Plus, removes
an ugly hack from trans and accidentally fixes a bug with constructing
ranges from references (see later commits with tests).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PR reverts #29543 and instead implements proper support for "=*m" and "+*m" indirect output operands. This provides a framework on top of which support for plain memory operands ("m", "=m" and "+m") can be implemented.
This also fixes the liveness analysis pass not handling read/write operands correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PR removes random remaining `Ident`s outside of libsyntax and performs general cleanup
In particular, interfaces of `Name` and `Ident` are tidied up, `Name`s and `Ident`s being small `Copy` aggregates are always passed to functions by value, and `Ident`s are never used as keys in maps, because `Ident` comparisons are tricky.
Although this PR closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/6993 there's still work related to it:
- `Name` can be made `NonZero` to compress numerous `Option<Name>`s and `Option<Ident>`s but it requires const unsafe functions.
- Implementation of `PartialEq` on `Ident` should be eliminated and replaced with explicit hygienic, non-hygienic or member-wise comparisons.
- Finally, large parts of AST can potentially be converted to `Name`s in the same way as HIR to clearly separate identifiers used in hygienic and non-hygienic contexts.
r? @nrc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #28109
|
|
|
|
This increases regionck performance greatly - type-checking on
librustc decreased from 9.1s to 8.1s. Because of Amdahl's law,
total performance is improved only by about 1.5% (LLVM wizards,
this is your opportunity to shine!).
before:
576.91user 4.26system 7:42.36elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1142192maxresident)k
after:
566.50user 4.84system 7:36.84elapsed 125%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1124304maxresident)k
I am somewhat worried really need to find out why we have this Red Queen's
Race going on here. Originally I suspected it may be a problem from RFC1214's
warnings, but it seems to be an effect from other changes.
However, the increase seems to be mostly in LLVM's time, so I guess
it's the LLVM wizards' problem.
|
|
|
|
This first patch starts by moving around pieces of state related to
type checking. The goal is to slowly unify the type checking state
into a single typing context. This initial patch moves the
ParameterEnvironment into the InferCtxt and moves shared tables
from Inherited and ty::ctxt into their own struct Tables. This
is the foundational work to refactoring the type checker to
enable future evolution of the language and tooling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
older `each` method, but is otherwise identical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update the graphviz tests accordingly.
Fixes #22073. (Includes regression test for the issue.)
(Factoring of aatch CFG code, Part 4.)
|
|
(Factoring of aatch CFG code, Part 2.)
|
|
(Factoring of aatch CFG code, Part 1.)
|
|
where possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conflicts:
src/librustc/middle/mem_categorization.rs
src/librustc/middle/ty.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/base.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/expr.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/foreign.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs
|
|
Conflicts:
src/compiletest/runtest.rs
src/libcore/fmt/mod.rs
src/libfmt_macros/lib.rs
src/libregex/parse.rs
src/librustc/middle/cfg/construct.rs
src/librustc/middle/dataflow.rs
src/librustc/middle/infer/higher_ranked/mod.rs
src/librustc/middle/ty.rs
src/librustc_back/archive.rs
src/librustc_borrowck/borrowck/fragments.rs
src/librustc_borrowck/borrowck/gather_loans/mod.rs
src/librustc_resolve/lib.rs
src/librustc_trans/back/link.rs
src/librustc_trans/save/mod.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/base.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/callee.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/common.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/consts.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/controlflow.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/debuginfo.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/expr.rs
src/librustc_trans/trans/monomorphize.rs
src/librustc_typeck/astconv.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/method/mod.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/mod.rs
src/librustc_typeck/check/regionck.rs
src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs
src/libsyntax/ext/format.rs
src/libsyntax/ext/source_util.rs
src/libsyntax/ext/tt/transcribe.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/mod.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs
src/test/run-pass/issue-8898.rs
|
|
fmt::Show is for debugging, and can and should be implemented for
all public types. This trait is used with `{:?}` syntax. There still
exists #[derive(Show)].
fmt::String is for types that faithfully be represented as a String.
Because of this, there is no way to derive fmt::String, all
implementations must be purposeful. It is used by the default format
syntax, `{}`.
This will break most instances of `{}`, since that now requires the type
to impl fmt::String. In most cases, replacing `{}` with `{:?}` is the
correct fix. Types that were being printed specifically for users should
receive a fmt::String implementation to fix this.
Part of #20013
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
to be that were being very loose with bound regions in trans (we were basically just ignoring and flattening binders). Since binders are significant to subtyping and hence to trait selection, this can cause a lot of problems. So this patch makes us treat them more strictly -- for example, we propagate binders, and avoid skipping past the `Binder` by writing `foo.0`.
Fixes #20644.
|