| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue refactoring macro expansion and resolution
This PR continues the work started in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62042.
It contains a set of more or less related refactorings with the general goal of making things simpler and more orthogonal.
Along the way most of the issues uncovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62086 are fixed.
The PR is better read in per-commit fashion with whitespace changes ignored.
I tried to leave some more detailed commit messages describing the motivation behind the individual changes.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44692
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52363
Unblocks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/62086
r? @matthewjasper
|
|
More consistent with other naming:
ExpnFormat -> ExpnKind
ExpnKind::name -> ExpnKind::descr
DesugaringKind::name -> DesugaringKind::descr
Shorter, no tautology:
CompilerDesugaring -> Desugaring
CompilerDesugaringKind -> DesugaringKind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exit arm scopes
Due to a bug in the HIR CFG construction, borrows for arm scopes were incorrectly leaking into other arms.
This PR also includes some drive-by improvements to `-Zunpretty=hir,identified` that would have been helpful while investigating this.
Closes #62107
|
|
Now that procedural macros no longer link transitively to libsyntax,
this shouldn't be needed any more! This commit is an experiment in
removing all dynamic libraries from rustc except for librustc_driver
itself. Let's see how far we can get with that!
|
|
|
|
The (almost) culmination of HirIdification
It's finally over.
This PR removes old `FIXME`s and renames some functions so that the `HirId` variant has the shorter name.
All that remains (and rightfully so) is stuff in `resolve`, `save_analysis` and (as far as I can tell) in a few places where we can't replace `NodeId` with `HirId`.
|
|
Implement another internal lints
cc #49509
This adds ~~two~~ one internal lint~~s~~:
1. LINT_PASS_IMPL_WITHOUT_MACRO: Make sure, that the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass` macro is used to implement lint passes. cc #59669
2. ~~USAGE_OF_TYCTXT_AND_SPAN_ARGS: item 2 on the list in #49509~~
~~With 2. I wasn't sure, if this lint should be applied everywhere. That means a careful review of 0955835 would be great. Also 73fb9b4 allows this lint on some functions. Should I also apply this lint there?~~
TODO (not directly relevant for review):
- [ ] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59316#discussion_r280186517 (not sure yet, if this works or how to query for `rustc_private`, since it's not in [`Features`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/syntax/feature_gate/struct.Features.html) :thinking: cc @eddyb)
- [x] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61735#discussion_r292389870
- [x] Check explicitly for the `{declare,impl}_lint_pass!` macros
r? @oli-obk
|
|
Remove io::Result from syntax::print
Since we're now writing directly to the vector, there's no need to
thread results through the whole printing infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since we're now writing directly to the vector, there's no need to
thread results through the whole printing infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Split `CommonTypes` into `CommonTypes` and `CommonLifetimes`
The so-called "`CommonTypes`" contains more than just types.
r? @eddyb
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also fully stabilizes two-phase borrows on all editions
|
|
|
|
Rename files about error codes
fixes #60017
This PR will be failed in tidy.
<details>
<summary>The log is here:</summary>
```
tidy check
tidy error: duplicate error code: 411
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:83: __diagnostic_used!(E0411);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:84: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0411".to_owned()));
tidy error: duplicate error code: 424
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:90: debug!("smart_resolve_path_fragment: E0424, source={:?}", source);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:92: __diagnostic_used!(E0424);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:93: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0424".to_owned()));
some tidy checks failed
```
</details>
I'd like to fix this but I don't know what to do.
I will work on later. Please let me know if you have any solutions.
r? @petrochenkov
|
|
|
|
|
|
- libarena
- librustc_allocator
- librustc_borrowck
- librustc_codegen_ssa
- librustc_codegen_utils
- librustc_driver
- librustc_errors
- librustc_incremental
- librustc_metadata
- librustc_passes
- librustc_privacy
- librustc_resolve
- librustc_save_analysis
- librustc_target
- librustc_traits
- libsyntax
- libsyntax_ext
- libsyntax_pos
|
|
When moving out of a for loop head, suggest borrowing it
When encountering code like the following, suggest borrowing the for loop
head to avoid moving it into the for loop pattern:
```
fn main() {
let a = vec![1, 2, 3];
for i in &a {
for j in a {
println!("{} * {} = {}", i, j, i * j);
}
}
}
```
Fix #25534.
|
|
When encountering code like the following, suggest borrowing the for loop
head to avoid moving it into the for loop pattern:
```
fn main() {
let a = vec![1, 2, 3];
for i in &a {
for j in a {
println!("{} * {} = {}", i, j, i * j);
}
}
}
```
|
|
This commit removes `CtorOf` from `Node::Ctor` as the parent of the
constructor can be determined by looking at the node's parent in the few
places where knowing this is necessary.
|
