| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove lint store from Session
|
|
|
|
This moves from calling get_lints on instantiated pass objects to the
raw object
|
|
|
|
|
|
syntax: Unsupport `foo! bar { ... }` macros in the parser
Their support in expansion was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61606.
Also un-reserve `macro_rules` as a macro name, there's no ambiguity between `macro_rules` definitions and macro calls (it also wasn't reserved correctly).
cc https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/wg-grammar/issues/51
|
|
|
|
Unreserve `macro_rules` as a macro name
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a less powerful duplicate of `SyntaxExtension::NormalTT`
|
|
|
|
|
|
And also the equality between `Path` and strings, because `Path` is made
up of `Symbol`s.
|
|
|
|
Cosmetic improvements to doc comments
This has been factored out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58036 to only include changes to documentation comments (throughout the rustc codebase).
r? @steveklabnik
Once you're happy with this, maybe we could get it through with r=1, so it doesn't constantly get invalidated? (I'm not sure this will be an issue, but just in case...) Anyway, thanks for your advice so far!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
attributes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like #43008 (f668999), but _much more aggressive_.
|
|
|
|
This commit extends the current unused macro linter
to support directives like #[allow(unused_macros)]
or #[deny(unused_macros)] directly next to the macro
definition, or in one of the modules the macro is
inside. Before, we only supported such directives
at a per crate level, due to the crate's NodeId
being passed to session.add_lint.
We also had to implement handling of the macro's
NodeId in the lint visitor.
|
|
In recent months there have been a few different people investigating how to make a plugin that
registers a MIR-pass – one that isn’t intended to be eventually merged into rustc proper.
The interface to register MIR passes was added primarily for miri (& later was
found to make prototyping of rustc-proper MIR passes a tiny bit faster). Since miri does not use
this interface anymore it seems like a good time to remove this "feature".
For prototyping purposes a similar interface can be added by developers themselves in their custom
rustc build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most of the Rust community agrees that the vec! macro is clearer when
called using square brackets [] instead of regular brackets (). Most of
these ocurrences are from before macros allowed using different types of
brackets.
There is one left unchanged in a pretty-print test, as the pretty
printer still wants it to have regular brackets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit adds syntax extension forms matching the types for procedural macros 2.0 (RFC #1566), these still require the usual syntax extension boiler plate, but this is a first step towards proper implementation and should be useful for macros 1.1 stuff too.
Supports both attribute-like and function-like macros.
|
|
|
|
Allow CompilerControllers to access rustc_plugin::registry::Registry
fixes #36064
I chose to put ructc_plugin::registry::Registry structure
into CompilerState structure, instead of Session structure.
This will preserve dependencies among librustc, libructc_driver, and libructc_plugin.
@jseyfried @sanxiyn
|
|
|
|
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1681] which adds support to the
compiler for first-class user-define custom `#[derive]` modes with a far more
stable API than plugins have today.
[RFC 1681]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1681-macros-1.1.md
The main features added by this commit are:
* A new `rustc-macro` crate-type. This crate type represents one which will
provide custom `derive` implementations and perhaps eventually flower into the
implementation of macros 2.0 as well.
* A new `rustc_macro` crate in the standard distribution. This crate will
provide the runtime interface between macro crates and the compiler. The API
here is particularly conservative right now but has quite a bit of room to
expand into any manner of APIs required by macro authors.
* The ability to load new derive modes through the `#[macro_use]` annotations on
other crates.
All support added here is gated behind the `rustc_macro` feature gate, both for
the library support (the `rustc_macro` crate) as well as the language features.
There are a few minor differences from the implementation outlined in the RFC,
such as the `rustc_macro` crate being available as a dylib and all symbols are
`dlsym`'d directly instead of having a shim compiled. These should only affect
the implementation, however, not the public interface.
This commit also ended up touching a lot of code related to `#[derive]`, making
a few notable changes:
* Recognized derive attributes are no longer desugared to `derive_Foo`. Wasn't
sure how to keep this behavior and *not* expose it to custom derive.
* Derive attributes no longer have access to unstable features by default, they
have to opt in on a granular level.
* The `derive(Copy,Clone)` optimization is now done through another "obscure
attribute" which is just intended to ferry along in the compiler that such an
optimization is possible. The `derive(PartialEq,Eq)` optimization was also
updated to do something similar.
---
One part of this PR which needs to be improved before stabilizing are the errors
and exact interfaces here. The error messages are relatively poor quality and
there are surprising spects of this such as `#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, MyTrait)]`
not working by default. The custom attributes added by the compiler end up
becoming unstable again when going through a custom impl.
Hopefully though this is enough to start allowing experimentation on crates.io!
syntax-[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
