| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-14 | Moved compile-fail tests to ui tests. | David Wood | -35/+0 | |
| 2015-01-05 | fix cfail tests | Jorge Aparicio | -1/+1 | |
| 2014-05-24 | core: rename strbuf::StrBuf to string::String | Richo Healey | -1/+1 | |
| [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2014-05-14 | test: Remove all uses of `~str` from the test suite. | Patrick Walton | -1/+1 | |
| 2014-04-05 | rustc: move the check_loop pass earlier. | Huon Wilson | -0/+2 | |
| This pass is purely AST based, and by running it earlier we emit more useful error messages, e.g. type inference fails in the case of `let r = break;` with few constraints on `r`, but its more useful to be told that the `break` is outside a loop (rather than a type error) when it is. Closes #13292. | ||||
| 2013-11-26 | test: Remove non-procedure uses of `do` from compiletest, libstd tests, | Patrick Walton | -2/+2 | |
| compile-fail tests, run-fail tests, and run-pass tests. | ||||
| 2013-11-12 | Improve error message for breaks in blocks | Alex Crichton | -4/+15 | |
| Before it was always stated that it was a "break outside of a loop" when you could very well be in a loop, but just in a block instead. Closes #3064 | ||||
| 2013-03-02 | Remove REC, change related tests/docs | Jihyun Yu | -1/+6 | |
| 2012-12-10 | Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+10 | |
| 2012-07-14 | Tear out ty_str and ty_vec. | Michael Sullivan | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-03-26 | Disallow ret inside of block functions | Marijn Haverbeke | -1/+1 | |
| Also adds proper checking for cont/break being inside a loop. Closes #1854 Issue #1619 | ||||
| 2012-02-16 | More rigorous reuse of cleanup sequences | Marijn Haverbeke | -1/+1 | |
| In both landing pads and break/cont/ret unwinding. Closes #300 | ||||
| 2011-08-20 | Reformat | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[] | ||||
| 2011-08-03 | Remove all xfail-stage0 directives | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0. | ||||
| 2011-07-27 | Reformat for new syntax | Marijn Haverbeke | -2/+2 | |
| 2011-06-25 | Remove variable name 'res' from test suite | Marijn Haverbeke | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-06-14 | Add xfail-stage0 to some tests (not sure if it matters...) | Tim Chevalier | -0/+1 | |
| 2011-06-10 | Friendlier error message for break outside a loop | Tim Chevalier | -0/+7 | |
| The typechecker should really check for this, but at least now there's an error message rather than an inexhaustive match failure in trans. | ||||
