| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-14 | Moved compile-fail tests to ui tests. | David Wood | -13/+0 | |
| 2017-07-07 | Only match a fragment specifier the if it starts with certain tokens. | kennytm | -1/+1 | |
| Fixes #24189. Fixes #26444. Fixes #27832. Fixes #34030. Fixes #35650. Fixes #39964. Fixes the 4th comment in #40569. Fixes the issue blocking #40984. | ||||
| 2016-04-24 | syntax: Make `is_path_start` precise and improve some error messages about ↵ | Vadim Petrochenkov | -3/+1 | |
| unexpected tokens | ||||
| 2014-10-29 | Rename fail! to panic! | Steve Klabnik | -1/+1 | |
| https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2013-10-25 | Remove ancient emacs mode lines from test cases | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| These are relics that serve no purpose. | ||||
| 2013-10-22 | Drop the '2' suffix from logging macros | Alex Crichton | -1/+1 | |
| Who doesn't like a massive renaming? | ||||
| 2013-09-30 | cfail: Remove usage of fmt! | Alex Crichton | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-02-13 | Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3 | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-01-31 | Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macro | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-12-10 | Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+10 | |
| 2011-07-27 | Fix damage done by the pretty-printer | Marijn Haverbeke | -6/+6 | |
| 2011-07-27 | Reformat for new syntax | Marijn Haverbeke | -6/+6 | |
| 2011-07-02 | Fix the error-pattern on compile-fail/fail-simple | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| Recent changes to the fail statement changed the way the parser errors in this scenario. | ||||
| 2011-05-17 | Parser fix: 'fail' was eating the next token that came after it. | Paul Stansifer | -0/+6 | |
