about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/compile-fail/pinned-deep-copy.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2014-10-02tests: remove uses of Gc.Eduard Burtescu-50/+0
2014-09-15Update error messages in compile-fail testsNiko Matsakis-2/+1
2014-08-17librustc: Allow trait bounds on structures and enumerations, and checkPatrick Walton-0/+1
them during kind checking. This implements RFC #11. Closes #15759.
2014-07-26Remove managed_box gate from testsBrian Anderson-1/+1
No longer does anything.
2014-06-20librustc: Put `#[unsafe_destructor]` behind a feature gate.Patrick Walton-1/+1
Closes #8142. This is not the semantics we want long-term. You can continue to use `#[unsafe_destructor]`, but you'll need to add `#![feature(unsafe_destructor)]` to the crate attributes. [breaking-change]
2014-06-14rustc: Obsolete the `@` syntax entirelyAlex Crichton-3/+4
This removes all remnants of `@` pointers from rustc. Additionally, this removes the `GC` structure from the prelude as it seems odd exporting an experimental type in the prelude by default. Closes #14193 [breaking-change]
2014-05-27Move std::{reflect,repr,Poly} to a libdebug crateAlex Crichton-0/+2
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental. This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this. Closes #12019 [breaking-change]
2014-05-06librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, exceptPatrick Walton-1/+1
for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change]
2014-03-28Convert most code to new inner attribute syntax.Brian Anderson-1/+1
Closes #2569
2014-03-15log: Introduce liblog, the old std::loggingAlex Crichton-2/+2
This commit moves all logging out of the standard library into an external crate. This crate is the new crate which is responsible for all logging macros and logging implementation. A few reasons for this change are: * The crate map has always been a bit of a code smell among rust programs. It has difficulty being loaded on almost all platforms, and it's used almost exclusively for logging and only logging. Removing the crate map is one of the end goals of this movement. * The compiler has a fair bit of special support for logging. It has the __log_level() expression as well as generating a global word per module specifying the log level. This is unfairly favoring the built-in logging system, and is much better done purely in libraries instead of the compiler itself. * Initialization of logging is much easier to do if there is no reliance on a magical crate map being available to set module log levels. * If the logging library can be written outside of the standard library, there's no reason that it shouldn't be. It's likely that we're not going to build the highest quality logging library of all time, so third-party libraries should be able to provide just as high-quality logging systems as the default one provided in the rust distribution. With a migration such as this, the change does not come for free. There are some subtle changes in the behavior of liblog vs the previous logging macros: * The core change of this migration is that there is no longer a physical log-level per module. This concept is still emulated (it is quite useful), but there is now only a global log level, not a local one. This global log level is a reflection of the maximum of all log levels specified. The previously generated logging code looked like: if specified_level <= __module_log_level() { println!(...) } The newly generated code looks like: if specified_level <= ::log::LOG_LEVEL { if ::log::module_enabled(module_path!()) { println!(...) } } Notably, the first layer of checking is still intended to be "super fast" in that it's just a load of a global word and a compare. The second layer of checking is executed to determine if the current module does indeed have logging turned on. This means that if any module has a debug log level turned on, all modules with debug log levels get a little bit slower (they all do more expensive dynamic checks to determine if they're turned on or not). Semantically, this migration brings no change in this respect, but runtime-wise, this will have a perf impact on some code. * A `RUST_LOG=::help` directive will no longer print out a list of all modules that can be logged. This is because the crate map will no longer specify the log levels of all modules, so the list of modules is not known. Additionally, warnings can no longer be provided if a malformed logging directive was supplied. The new "hello world" for logging looks like: #[phase(syntax, link)] extern crate log; fn main() { debug!("Hello, world!"); }
2014-01-03test: De-`@mut` the test suitePatrick Walton-4/+6
2013-10-23register snapshotsDaniel Micay-0/+2
2013-10-22Drop the '2' suffix from logging macrosAlex Crichton-2/+2
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30cfail: Remove usage of fmt!Alex Crichton-2/+2
2013-09-16switch Drop to `&mut self`Daniel Micay-1/+1
2013-07-17librustc: Remove all uses of "copy".Patrick Walton-2/+5
2013-07-17Clean-up tests after debug!/std-macros change.Huon Wilson-1/+1
The entire testsuite is converted to using info! rather than debug! because some depend on the code within the debug! being trans'd.
2013-06-25Change finalize -> drop.Luqman Aden-1/+1
2013-03-21librustc: Forbid destructors from being attached to any structs that might ↵Patrick Walton-1/+4
contain non-Owned fields. r=nmatsakis
2013-03-11Remove uses of logBrian Anderson-2/+2
2013-02-21Remove the last bits of structural records from tests/rustc/rusti/rustpkg.Luqman Aden-1/+2
2013-02-14librustc: Replace `impl Type : Trait` with `impl Trait for Type`. ↵Patrick Walton-1/+1
rs=implflipping
2013-02-08Fix subtle error in caching during kind computation that could cause linearNiko Matsakis-3/+1
values to be copied. Rewrite kind computation so that instead of directly computing the kind it computes what kinds of values are present in the type, and then derive kinds based on that. I find this easier to think about. Fixes #4821.
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-12-06test: Fix more compile-fail bustage. rs=bustagePatrick Walton-1/+1
2012-11-29librustc: Make the Drop trait use explicit selfPatrick Walton-1/+1
2012-11-14Convert the test suite to use the Drop traitBen Striegel-2/+7
2012-09-07Remove 'let' syntax for struct fieldsBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-09-06Remove struct ctorsBrian Anderson-1/+6
2012-08-17Remove the class keywordBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-06-01Port more resource tests to classesTim Chevalier-2/+4
2012-05-23Resources are once again not copyable.Eric Holk-0/+16
2012-05-22Send is no longer a subkind of copy. This allows for sendable, but ↵Eric Holk-16/+0
non-copyable resources. Closes #2420.
2012-03-26Bulk-edit mutable -> mut.Graydon Hoare-2/+2
2011-12-22Register new snapshots, purge log_err and log_full in favour of log(...).Graydon Hoare-2/+2
2011-12-22Register snapshots and switch logging over to use of log_full or #error / ↵Graydon Hoare-2/+2
#debug.
2011-11-18Update stdlib, compiler, and tests to new kind systemMarijn Haverbeke-2/+2
This involved adding 'copy' to more generics than I hoped, but an experiment with making it implicit showed that that way lies madness -- unless enforced, you will not remember to mark functions that don't copy as not requiring copyable kind. Issue #1177
2011-11-18Preparation for kind system overhaulMarijn Haverbeke-0/+1
This goes before a snapshot, so that subsequenct patches can make the transition without breaking the build. Disables kind checking pass, makes parser accept both new and old-style kind annotation. Issue #1177
2011-09-28Make error patterns in some kind tests more specificBrian Anderson-1/+1
2011-09-27Don't ever raise unique kinds of pinned kinds to shared (again)Brian Anderson-2/+1
So *resource, ~resource, [resource] are all pinned. This is counter to the design of the kind system, but this way is a much clearer path to type safety. Once we've established a good baseline with lots of tests, then we can try to make raising pinned kinds work.
2011-09-27Add an xfailed test for bogus deep copying of things containing resourcesBrian Anderson-0/+16