| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
closure kind, thereby detecting what happens if there are
mismatches. Simply removing the `:` annotations caused most of these
tests to pass or produce other errors, because the inference would
convert the closure into a more appropriate kind. (The ability to
override the inference by using the expected type is an important
backdoor partly for this reason.)
|
|
explicit form `Fn<A,B>` and now should use `Fn(A) -> B` or
`Fn<A,Output=B>`, but in some cases we get duplicate error
reports. This is mildly annoying and arises because of the main error
and another error from the projection. Might be worth squashing those,
but seems like a separate problem.
|
|
|
|
hierarchy.
|
|
Part of issue #16640. I am leaving this issue open to handle parsing of
higher-rank lifetimes in traits.
This change breaks code that used unboxed closures:
* Instead of `F:|&: int| -> int`, write `F:Fn(int) -> int`.
* Instead of `F:|&mut: int| -> int`, write `F:FnMut(int) -> int`.
* Instead of `F:|: int| -> int`, write `F:FnOnce(int) -> int`.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
This patch primarily does two things: (1) it prevents lifetimes from
leaking out of unboxed closures; (2) it allows unboxed closure type
notation, call notation, and construction notation to construct closures
matching any of the three traits.
This breaks code that looked like:
let mut f;
{
let x = &5i;
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
Change this code to avoid having a reference escape. For example:
{
let x = &5i;
let mut f; // <-- move here to avoid dangling reference
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
I believe this is enough to consider unboxed closures essentially
implemented. Further issues (for example, higher-rank lifetimes) should
be filed as followups.
Closes #14449.
[breaking-change]
|
