about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/debuginfo/issue-22656.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2023-01-11Move /src/test to /testsAlbert Larsan-48/+0
2020-06-09Implement new gdb/lldb pretty-printersortem-5/+4
Replace old GDB and LLDB pretty-printers with new ones which were originally written for IntelliJ Rust. New LLDB pretty-printers support synthetic children. New GDB/LLDB pretty-printers support all Rust types supported by old pretty-printers, and also support: Rc, Arc, Cell, Ref, RefCell, RefMut, HashMap, HashSet.
2019-09-18fix debuginfo/issue22656 with LLDB 8Maximilian Roos-1/+1
2018-12-25Remove licensesMark Rousskov-11/+0
2018-10-08Run debuginfo tests against rust-enabled lldb, when possibleTom Tromey-3/+5
If the rust-enabled lldb was built, then use it when running the debuginfo tests. Updating the lldb submodule was necessary as this needed a way to differentiate the rust-enabled lldb, so I added a line to the --version output. This adds compiletest commands to differentiate between the rust-enabled and non-rust-enabled lldb, as is already done for gdb. A new "rust-lldb" header directive is also added, but not used in this patch; I plan to use it in #54004. This updates all the tests.
2016-12-19prefer hyphens in test files named after issue numbersZack M. Davis-0/+58
We have a lot of tests with filenames honoring particular issues by number. Typically, these are called issue-${issue_no}.rs (note the hyphen): ``` $ find . -regextype posix-egrep -regex '.*/issue-[0-9]*.rs' | wc 1289 1289 35935 ``` We also had a much smaller number of files that are like this, but don't have a hyphen in between the substring `issue` and the number: ``` $ find . -regextype posix-egrep -regex '.*/issue[0-9]*.rs' ./debuginfo/issue14411.rs ./debuginfo/issue12886.rs ./debuginfo/issue13213.rs ./debuginfo/issue22656.rs ./debuginfo/issue7712.rs ./compile-fail/issue32829.rs ./run-pass/issue24353.rs ./run-pass/issue34796.rs ./run-pass/issue18173.rs ./run-pass/issue22346.rs ./run-pass/auxiliary/issue13507.rs ./run-pass/issue26127.rs ./run-pass/issue22008.rs ./run-pass/issue34569.rs ./run-pass/issue29927.rs ./run-pass/issue36260.rs ``` Some would argue that the inconsistency is æsthetically displeasing, hence this trivial patch. (Note that run-pass/auxiliary/issue13507.rs has an excuse; it's `use`d in run-pass/issue-13507-2.rs; the matter of there being two different compile-fail tests with different name conventions for issue #32829 is also neglected here for the sake of keeping this trivial cleanup patch as trivial as possible for ease of review.)