| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
closes #54441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tweak unclosed delimiter parser error
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature gate `rustc_` and `derive_` with their own gates again instead of `custom_attribute`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that `..=` inclusive ranges are stabilized, people probably
shouldn't be using `...` even in patterns, even if it's still legal
there (see #51043). To avoid drawing attention to `...` being a real
thing, let's reword this message to just say "unexpected token" rather
"cannot be used in expressions".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
parser: Split `+=` into `+` and `=` where `+` is explicitly requested (such as generics)
Added functions in tokens to check whether a token leads with `+`. Used them when parsing to allow for token splitting of `+=` into `+` and `=`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/47856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Removed 'proc' from the reserved keywords list
Remove 'proc' from the reserved keywords list.
'proc' is a very useful identifier name for a lot of things. It's especially useful when dealing with processes, operating system internals, and kernel development.
|
|
|
|
Expand macros in `extern {}` blocks
This permits macro and proc-macro and attribute invocations (the latter only with the `proc_macro` feature of course) in `extern {}` blocks, gated behind a new `macros_in_extern` feature.
A tracking issue is now open at #49476
closes #48747
|
|
|
|
Closes #22181, #27779
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize the syntax `a..=b` and `..=b`.
|
|
Stabilize std::ops::RangeInclusive and std::ops::RangeInclusiveTo.
|
|
(Meanwhile, a couple of parse-fail tests are moved to UI tests so that
the reader can see the new output, and an existing UI test is given a
more evocative name.)
|
|
Warn about ignored generic bounds in `for`
This adds a new lint to fix #42181. For consistency and to avoid code duplication, I also moved the existing "bounds in type aliases are ignored" here.
Questions to the reviewer:
* Is it okay to just remove a diagnostic error code like this? Should I instead keep the warning about type aliases where it is? The old code provided a detailed explanation of what's going on when asked, that information is now lost. On the other hand, `span_warn!` seems deprecated (after this patch, it has exactly one user left!).
* Did I miss any syntactic construct that can appear as `for` in the surface syntax? I covered function types (`for<'a> fn(...)`), generic traits (`for <'a> Fn(...)`, can appear both as bounds as as trait objects) and bounds (`for<'a> F: ...`).
* For the sake of backwards compatibility, this adds a warning, not an error. @nikomatsakis suggested an error in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42181#issuecomment-306924389, but I feel that can only happen in a new epoch -- right?
Cc @eddyb
|
|
Also move the check for not having type parameters into ast_validation.
I was not sure what to do with compile-fail/issue-23046.rs: The issue looks like
maybe the bounds actually played a role in triggering the ICE, but that seems
unlikely given that the compiler seems to entirely ignore them. However, I
couldn't find a testcase without the bounds, so I figured the best I could do is
to just remove the bounds and make sure at least that keeps working.
|
|
Improve recovery for trailing comma after `..`
|
|
Implement `?` macro repetition
See rust-lang/rfcs#2298 (with disposition merge)
|
|
Currently ', " and \ are escaped as \', \" and \\ respectively. This
leads to confusing messages such as `error: unknown start of token: \\`
when encountering a single backslash.
Fix by emitting printable ASCII characters directly. This will still
escape \r, \n, \t and Unicode characters.
Fixes #47902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properly parse impls for the never type `!`
Recover from missing `for` in `impl Trait for Type`
Prohibit inherent default impls and default impls of auto traits
Change wording in more diagnostics to use "auto traits"
Some minor code cleanups in the parser
|
|
`struct` pattern parsing and diagnostic tweaks
- Recover from struct parse error on match and point out missing match
body.
- Point at struct when finding non-identifier while parsing its fields.
- Add label to "expected identifier, found {}" error.
Fix #15980.
|
|
- Recover from struct parse error on match and point out missing match
body.
- Point at struct when finding non-identifier while parsing its fields.
- Add label to "expected identifier, found {}" error.
|
|
Support `extern` in paths
Implement the primary alternative to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46613 + https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45771, achieving the same effect without requiring changes to other imports.
Both need to be experimentally evaluated before making further progress.
The PR also adds docs for all these related features into the unstable book.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44660
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
|
|
It looks like many of these tests are already disabled on emscripten,
which also doesn't seem to support environment variables and subprocess
spawning. Just add a similar tag for CloudABI. While there, sort some of
the lists of operating systems alphabetically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a parse error occurs on a block, the parser will recover and create
a block with the statements collected until that point. Now a flag
stating that a recovery has been performed in this block is propagated
so that the type checker knows that the type of the block (which will be
identified as `()`) shouldn't be checked against the expectation to
reduce the amount of irrelevant diagnostic errors shown to the user.
|
|
|
|
|
