| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-11-11 | test: Rename files, fail -> panic. | Michael Sproul | -16/+0 | |
| 2014-10-29 | Rename fail! to panic! | Steve Klabnik | -1/+1 | |
| https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2014-05-27 | std: Rename strbuf operations to string | Richo Healey | -1/+1 | |
| [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2014-05-24 | core: rename strbuf::StrBuf to string::String | Richo Healey | -1/+1 | |
| [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2014-05-14 | test: Remove all uses of `~str` from the test suite. | Patrick Walton | -1/+4 | |
| 2014-04-18 | Replace all ~"" with "".to_owned() | Richo Healey | -1/+1 | |
| 2014-03-14 | extra: Put the nail in the coffin, delete libextra | Alex Crichton | -1/+0 | |
| This commit shreds all remnants of libextra from the compiler and standard distribution. Two modules, c_vec/tempfile, were moved into libstd after some cleanup, and the other modules were moved to separate crates as seen fit. Closes #8784 Closes #12413 Closes #12576 | ||||
| 2014-02-14 | extern mod => extern crate | Alex Crichton | -1/+1 | |
| This was previously implemented, and it just needed a snapshot to go through | ||||
| 2013-10-22 | Drop the '2' suffix from logging macros | Alex Crichton | -1/+1 | |
| Who doesn't like a massive renaming? | ||||
| 2013-09-30 | rfail: Remove usage of fmt! | Alex Crichton | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-05-22 | test: Update tests to use the new syntax. | Patrick Walton | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-02-13 | Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3 | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2013-01-31 | Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macro | Nick Desaulniers | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-12-10 | Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+10 | |
| 2012-09-11 | Convert 'use' to 'extern mod'. Remove old 'use' syntax | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-08-23 | `m1!{...}` -> `m1!(...)` | Paul Stansifer | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-07-30 | Change syntax extension syntax: `#m[...]` -> `m!{...}`. | Paul Stansifer | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-07-14 | Move the world over to using the new style string literals and types. Closes ↵ | Michael Sullivan | -1/+1 | |
| #2907. | ||||
| 2011-09-11 | Begin valgrinding some run-fail tests that unwind correctly | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| Issue #236 | ||||
| 2011-09-02 | Reformat. Issue #855 | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-09-01 | Convert all uses of #ifmt to #fmt. Issue #855 | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-09-01 | Remove std::str. Issue #855 | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| 2011-08-31 | Convert uses of #fmt to #ifmt. Issue #855 | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-08-20 | Reformat | Brian Anderson | -1/+1 | |
| This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[] | ||||
| 2011-08-10 | Begin valgrinding run-fail tests | Brian Anderson | -0/+1 | |
| Introduce a temporary no-valgrind directive for the few that aren't clean | ||||
| 2011-08-03 | Remove all xfail-stage0 directives | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0. | ||||
| 2011-08-03 | Un-xfail more pretty-printing tests | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| 2011-08-02 | Pretty-print test the rfail tests. Issue #789 | Brian Anderson | -0/+1 | |
| 2011-07-27 | Reformat for new syntax | Marijn Haverbeke | -4/+1 | |
| 2011-07-03 | Manipulate contexts correctly in trans_fail_expr | Tim Chevalier | -0/+9 | |
| This fixes Issue #617 | ||||
