rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2014-11-11	test: Rename files, fail -> panic.	Michael Sproul	-13/+0

2014-10-29	Rename fail! to panic!	Steve Klabnik	-1/+1
	https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . \| xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-03-14	extra: Put the nail in the coffin, delete libextra	Alex Crichton	-1/+0
	This commit shreds all remnants of libextra from the compiler and standard distribution. Two modules, c_vec/tempfile, were moved into libstd after some cleanup, and the other modules were moved to separate crates as seen fit. Closes #8784 Closes #12413 Closes #12576
2014-02-14	extern mod => extern crate	Alex Crichton	-1/+1
	This was previously implemented, and it just needed a snapshot to go through
2013-10-22	Drop the '2' suffix from logging macros	Alex Crichton	-1/+1
	Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30	rfail: Remove usage of fmt!	Alex Crichton	-1/+1

2013-08-03	remove obsolete `foreach` keyword	Daniel Micay	-1/+1
	this has been replaced by `for`
2013-08-02	replace `range` with an external iterator	Daniel Micay	-3/+1

2013-05-29	librustc: Stop reexporting the standard modules from prelude.	Patrick Walton	-0/+3

2013-05-22	test: Update tests to use the new syntax.	Patrick Walton	-1/+1

2013-05-14	Use static string with fail!() and remove fail!(fmt!())	Björn Steinbrink	-1/+1
	fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for the caller to call fmt!() itself.
2013-02-13	Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3	Nick Desaulniers	-1/+1

2013-01-31	Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macro	Nick Desaulniers	-1/+1

2012-12-10	Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+10

2012-09-11	Convert 'use' to 'extern mod'. Remove old 'use' syntax	Brian Anderson	-1/+1

2012-09-05	test: "import" -> "use"	Patrick Walton	-1/+0

2012-07-14	Move the world over to using the new style string literals and types. Closes ↵	Michael Sullivan	-1/+1
	#2907.
2012-07-01	Convert to new closure syntax	Brian Anderson	-1/+1

2012-06-30	Eliminate usages of old sugared call syntax	Brian Anderson	-1/+1

2011-12-13	Copy first batch of material from libstd to libcore.	Graydon Hoare	-1/+1

2011-10-21	Remove remaining uses of iter and for-each	Marijn Haverbeke	-1/+1
	Issue #1056
2011-08-15	The wonky for...in... whitespace was bothering me. Sorry!	Lindsey Kuper	-1/+1

2011-08-03	Remove all xfail-stage0 directives	Brian Anderson	-1/+0
	While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27	Reformat for new syntax	Marijn Haverbeke	-5/+1

2011-07-05	Handle fail inside a for-each loop properly	Tim Chevalier	-0/+9