| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
|
|
Conflicts:
src/libcollections/slice.rs
src/libcore/failure.rs
src/libsyntax/parse/token.rs
src/test/debuginfo/basic-types-mut-globals.rs
src/test/debuginfo/simple-struct.rs
src/test/debuginfo/trait-pointers.rs
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
|
|
|
|
|
|
fail!() used to require owned strings but can handle static strings
now. Also, it can pass its arguments to fmt!() on its own, no need for
the caller to call fmt!() itself.
|
|
|
|
fail
Fix merge conflicts - Issue 4524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2907.
|
|
|
|
The code in Issue 948 was causing typestate to diverge because
it was using the prestate for the whole expression -- not the post-
state for the fields list -- as the prestate for the record base
expression. Fixed.
Closes #948
|
