| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
They are so annoying to update, and haven't caught any bugs afaik.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
listed (an improvement, I think).
|
|
|
|
(Inspired by discussion with Gankro.)
|
|
Until some backwards-compatibility hazards are fixed in #23121,
these need to be unstable.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Update the graphviz tests accordingly.
Fixes #22073. (Includes regression test for the issue.)
(Factoring of aatch CFG code, Part 4.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit removes a number of deprecated flags from the compiler:
* opt-level => -C opt-level
* debuginfo => -C debuginfo
* print-crate-name => --print crate-name
* print-file-name => --print file-names
* no-trans => -Z no-trans
* no-analysis => -Z no-analysis
* parse-only => -Z parse-only
* dep-info => --emit dep-info
This commit also moves the --pretty flag behind `-Z unstable-options` as the
pretty printer will likely not be stable for 1.0
cc #19051
|
|
This makes the tests much easier to maintain; the particular details
of the labels attached to exiting scopes is not worth the effort
required to keep it up to date as things change in the compiler
internals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
`--xpretty` option.
|
|
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = Foo::A;
}
```
[breaking-change]
|
|
This commit implements processing these two attributes at the crate level as
well as at the item level. When #[cfg] is applied at the crate level, then the
entire crate will be omitted if the cfg doesn't match. The #[cfg_attr] attribute
is processed as usual in that the attribute is included or not depending on
whether the cfg matches.
This was spurred on by motivations of #18585 where #[cfg_attr] annotations will
be applied at the crate-level.
cc #18585
|
|
|
|
|
|
[breaking-change]
1. The internal layout for traits has changed from (vtable, data) to (data, vtable). If you were relying on this in unsafe transmutes, you might get some very weird and apparently unrelated errors. You should not be doing this! Prefer not to do this at all, but if you must, you should use raw::TraitObject rather than hardcoding rustc's internal representation into your code.
2. The minimal type of reference-to-vec-literals (e.g., `&[1, 2, 3]`) is now a fixed size vec (e.g., `&[int, ..3]`) where it used to be an unsized vec (e.g., `&[int]`). If you want the unszied type, you must explicitly give the type (e.g., `let x: &[_] = &[1, 2, 3]`). Note in particular where multiple blocks must have the same type (e.g., if and else clauses, vec elements), the compiler will not coerce to the unsized type without a hint. E.g., `[&[1], &[1, 2]]` used to be a valid expression of type '[&[int]]'. It no longer type checks since the first element now has type `&[int, ..1]` and the second has type &[int, ..2]` which are incompatible.
3. The type of blocks (including functions) must be coercible to the expected type (used to be a subtype). Mostly this makes things more flexible and not less (in particular, in the case of coercing function bodies to the return type). However, in some rare cases, this is less flexible. TBH, I'm not exactly sure of the exact effects. I think the change causes us to resolve inferred type variables slightly earlier which might make us slightly more restrictive. Possibly it only affects blocks with unreachable code. E.g., `if ... { fail!(); "Hello" }` used to type check, it no longer does. The fix is to add a semicolon after the string.
|
|
|
|
the CFG for match statements.
There were two bugs in issue #14684. One was simply that the borrow
check didn't know about the correct CFG for match statements: the
pattern must be a predecessor of the guard. This disallows the bad
behavior if there are bindings in the pattern. But it isn't enough to
prevent the memory safety problem, because of wildcards; thus, this
patch introduces a more restrictive rule, which disallows assignments
and mutable borrows inside guards outright.
I discussed this with Niko and we decided this was the best plan of
action.
This breaks code that performs mutable borrows in pattern guards. Most
commonly, the code looks like this:
impl Foo {
fn f(&mut self, ...) {}
fn g(&mut self, ...) {
match bar {
Baz if self.f(...) => { ... }
_ => { ... }
}
}
}
Change this code to not use a guard. For example:
impl Foo {
fn f(&mut self, ...) {}
fn g(&mut self, ...) {
match bar {
Baz => {
if self.f(...) {
...
} else {
...
}
}
_ => { ... }
}
}
}
Sometimes this can result in code duplication, but often it illustrates
a hidden memory safety problem.
Closes #14684.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
floating point numbers for real.
This will break code that looks like:
let mut x = 0;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Change that code to:
let mut x = 0i;
while ... {
x += 1;
}
println!("{}", x);
Closes #15201.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
Each test works by rendering the flowgraph for the last identified
block we see in expanded pretty-printed output, and comparing it (via
`diff`) against a checked in "foo.dot-expected.dot" file.
Each test post-processes the output to remove NodeIds ` (id=NUM)` so
that the expected output is somewhat stable (or at least independent
of how we assign NodeIds) and easier for a human to interpret when
looking at the expected output file itself.
----
Test writing style notes:
I usually tried to write the tests in a way that would avoid duplicate
labels in the output rendered flow graph, when possible.
The tests that have string literals "unreachable" in the program text
are deliberately written that way to remind the reader that the
unreachable nodes in the resulting graph are not an error in the
control flow computation, but rather a natural consequence of its
construction.
|
