about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-make/sepcomp-separate
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2018-03-22rustc: Add a `#[wasm_custom_section]` attributeAlex Crichton-42/+0
This commit is an implementation of adding custom sections to wasm artifacts in rustc. The intention here is to expose the ability of the wasm binary format to contain custom sections with arbitrary user-defined data. Currently neither our version of LLVM nor LLD supports this so the implementation is currently custom to rustc itself. The implementation here is to attach a `#[wasm_custom_section = "foo"]` attribute to any `const` which has a type like `[u8; N]`. Other types of constants aren't supported yet but may be added one day! This should hopefully be enough to get off the ground with *some* custom section support. The current semantics are that any constant tagged with `#[wasm_custom_section]` section will be *appended* to the corresponding section in the final output wasm artifact (and this affects dependencies linked in as well, not just the final crate). This means that whatever is interpreting the contents must be able to interpret binary-concatenated sections (or each constant needs to be in its own custom section). To test this change the existing `run-make` test suite was moved to a `run-make-fulldeps` folder and a new `run-make` test suite was added which applies to all targets by default. This test suite currently only has one test which only runs for the wasm target (using a node.js script to use `WebAssembly` in JS to parse the wasm output).
2017-11-07Update run-make tests.Michael Woerister-1/+7
2017-10-07rustc: Implement ThinLTOAlex Crichton-1/+1
This commit is an implementation of LLVM's ThinLTO for consumption in rustc itself. Currently today LTO works by merging all relevant LLVM modules into one and then running optimization passes. "Thin" LTO operates differently by having more sharded work and allowing parallelism opportunities between optimizing codegen units. Further down the road Thin LTO also allows *incremental* LTO which should enable even faster release builds without compromising on the performance we have today. This commit uses a `-Z thinlto` flag to gate whether ThinLTO is enabled. It then also implements two forms of ThinLTO: * In one mode we'll *only* perform ThinLTO over the codegen units produced in a single compilation. That is, we won't load upstream rlibs, but we'll instead just perform ThinLTO amongst all codegen units produced by the compiler for the local crate. This is intended to emulate a desired end point where we have codegen units turned on by default for all crates and ThinLTO allows us to do this without performance loss. * In anther mode, like full LTO today, we'll optimize all upstream dependencies in "thin" mode. Unlike today, however, this LTO step is fully parallelized so should finish much more quickly. There's a good bit of comments about what the implementation is doing and where it came from, but the tl;dr; is that currently most of the support here is copied from upstream LLVM. This code duplication is done for a number of reasons: * Controlling parallelism means we can use the existing jobserver support to avoid overloading machines. * We will likely want a slightly different form of incremental caching which integrates with our own incremental strategy, but this is yet to be determined. * This buys us some flexibility about when/where we run ThinLTO, as well as having it tailored to fit our needs for the time being. * Finally this allows us to reuse some artifacts such as our `TargetMachine` creation, where all our options we used today aren't necessarily supported by upstream LLVM yet. My hope is that we can get some experience with this copy/paste in tree and then eventually upstream some work to LLVM itself to avoid the duplication while still ensuring our needs are met. Otherwise I fear that maintaining these bindings may be quite costly over the years with LLVM updates!
2015-03-26Mass rename uint/int to usize/isizeAlex Crichton-3/+3
Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
2014-12-19rustc: Start "stabilizing" some flagsAlex Crichton-1/+1
This commit shuffles around some CLI flags of the compiler to some more stable locations with some renamings. The changes made were: * The `-v` flag has been repurposes as the "verbose" flag. The version flag has been renamed to `-V`. * The `-h` screen has been split into two parts. Most top-level options (not all) show with `-h`, and the remaining options (generally obscure) can be shown with `--help -v` which is a "verbose help screen" * The `-V` flag (version flag now) has lost its argument as it is now requested with `rustc -vV` "verbose version". * The `--emit` option has had its `ir` and `bc` variants renamed to `llvm-ir` and `llvm-bc` to emphasize that they are LLVM's IR/bytecode. * The `--emit` option has grown a new variant, `dep-info`, which subsumes the `--dep-info` CLI argument. The `--dep-info` flag is now deprecated. * The `--parse-only`, `--no-trans`, and `--no-analysis` flags have moved behind the `-Z` family of flags. * The `--debuginfo` and `--opt-level` flags were moved behind the top-level `-C` flag. * The `--print-file-name` and `--print-crate-name` flags were moved behind one global `--print` flag which now accepts one of `crate-name`, `file-names`, or `sysroot`. This global `--print` flag is intended to serve as a mechanism for learning various metadata about the compiler itself. No warnings are currently enabled to allow tools like Cargo to have time to migrate to the new flags before spraying warnings to all users.
2014-09-05add tests for separate compilationStuart Pernsteiner-0/+36