about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/attr-main-2.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2019-07-27tests: Move run-pass tests without naming conflicts to uiVadim Petrochenkov-11/+0
2019-07-27tests: Add missing run-pass annotationsVadim Petrochenkov-0/+2
2018-12-25Remove licensesMark Rousskov-11/+0
2015-04-08Remove pretty-expanded from failing testsAlex Crichton-1/+0
This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-03-23rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expandedBrian Anderson-0/+2
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2015-01-16syntax: Feature gate #[start] and #[main]Alex Crichton-0/+1
These two attributes are used to change the entry point into a Rust program, but for now they're being put behind feature gates until we have a chance to think about them a little more. The #[start] attribute specifically may have its signature changed. This is a breaking change to due the usage of these attributes generating errors by default now. If your crate is using these attributes, add this to your crate root: #![feature(start)] // if you're using the #[start] attribute #![feature(main)] // if you're using the #[main] attribute cc #20064
2014-10-29Rename fail! to panic!Steve Klabnik-1/+1
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-04-06Remove check-fast. Closes #4193, #8844, #6330, #7416Brian Anderson-1/+0
2014-02-11Change `xfail` directives in compiletests to `ignore`, closes #11363Florian Hahn-2/+2
2013-10-22Drop the '2' suffix from logging macrosAlex Crichton-1/+1
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30rpass: Remove usage of fmt!Alex Crichton-1/+1
2013-02-13Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3Nick Desaulniers-1/+1
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2013-01-31Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macroNick Desaulniers-1/+1
2013-01-18xfail-fast the #[main] tests, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-0/+2
2013-01-14allowing the entry point name to be something other than mainILyoan-0/+17
add build tests