| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-27 | tests: Move run-pass tests without naming conflicts to ui | Vadim Petrochenkov | -61/+0 | |
| 2019-07-27 | tests: Add missing run-pass annotations | Vadim Petrochenkov | -0/+2 | |
| 2018-12-25 | Remove licenses | Mark Rousskov | -10/+0 | |
| 2018-09-21 | Allow various lints as part of ui-ifying `src/test/run-pass` suite. | Felix S. Klock II | -0/+2 | |
| 2015-04-08 | Remove pretty-expanded from failing tests | Alex Crichton | -1/+0 | |
| This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable. | ||||
| 2015-03-23 | rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded | Brian Anderson | -0/+2 | |
| Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work. | ||||
| 2015-01-30 | Remove all `i` suffixes | Tobias Bucher | -5/+5 | |
| 2014-06-24 | librustc: Remove the fallback to `int` from typechecking. | Niko Matsakis | -5/+5 | |
| This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are: * `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`; * `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`; * `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`. RFC #30. Closes #6023. [breaking-change] | ||||
| 2013-05-19 | Use assert_eq! rather than assert! where possible | Corey Richardson | -2/+2 | |
| 2013-03-29 | librustc: Remove `fail_unless!` | Patrick Walton | -2/+2 | |
| 2013-03-07 | librustc: Convert all uses of `assert` over to `fail_unless!` | Patrick Walton | -2/+2 | |
| 2013-02-01 | check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree | Graydon Hoare | -1/+1 | |
| 2012-12-10 | Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+10 | |
| 2011-09-19 | Un-xfail various tests | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| 2011-09-16 | Require body of else-less if expressions to be a value-less block | Marijn Haverbeke | -3/+3 | |
| For consistency with other constructs that could not possibly return a value (say, loops). | ||||
| 2011-09-15 | Remove maybe_protect_block kludge from pretty-printer | Marijn Haverbeke | -0/+1 | |
| It is no longer needed. | ||||
| 2011-08-19 | Add a comment about our single use of no-reformat | Brian Anderson | -0/+3 | |
| 2011-08-03 | Disambiguate unop statements in pretty-printer. Closes #674 | Brian Anderson | -1/+0 | |
| 2011-08-02 | Add xfail-pretty directives to tests that don't pretty-print correctly | Brian Anderson | -0/+1 | |
| Issue #789 | ||||
| 2011-07-27 | Fix damage done by the pretty-printer | Marijn Haverbeke | -1/+1 | |
| 2011-06-16 | Add support for marking files no-reformat. | Graydon Hoare | -0/+2 | |
| 2011-06-14 | Add new testcase to show the nature of our exciting block-expr / trailing ↵ | Graydon Hoare | -0/+51 | |
| unop interaction. | ||||
