about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/conditional-debug-macro-off.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2016-03-07mk: Distribute fewer TARGET_CRATESAlex Crichton-23/+0
Right now everything in TARGET_CRATES is built by default for all non-fulldeps tests and is distributed by default for all target standard library packages. Currenly this includes a number of unstable crates which are rarely used such as `graphviz` and `rbml`> This commit trims down the set of `TARGET_CRATES`, moves a number of tests to `*-fulldeps` as a result, and trims down the dependencies of libtest so we can distribute fewer crates in the `rust-std` packages.
2015-04-08Remove pretty-expanded from failing testsAlex Crichton-1/+0
This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-03-23rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expandedBrian Anderson-0/+2
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2015-03-23Require feature attributes, and add them where necessaryBrian Anderson-0/+2
2015-03-05rustc: Add a debug_assertions #[cfg] directiveAlex Crichton-1/+1
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 563][rfc] which adds a new `cfg(debug_assertions)` directive which is specially recognized and calculated by the compiler. The flag is turned off at any optimization level greater than 1 and may also be explicitly controlled through the `-C debug-assertions` flag. [rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/563 The `debug_assert!` and `debug_assert_eq!` macros now respect this instead of the `ndebug` variable and `ndebug` no longer holds any meaning to the standard library. Code which was previously relying on `not(ndebug)` to gate expensive code should be updated to rely on `debug_assertions` instead. Closes #22492 [breaking-change]
2015-01-06core: split into fmt::Show and fmt::StringSean McArthur-1/+1
fmt::Show is for debugging, and can and should be implemented for all public types. This trait is used with `{:?}` syntax. There still exists #[derive(Show)]. fmt::String is for types that faithfully be represented as a String. Because of this, there is no way to derive fmt::String, all implementations must be purposeful. It is used by the default format syntax, `{}`. This will break most instances of `{}`, since that now requires the type to impl fmt::String. In most cases, replacing `{}` with `{:?}` is the correct fix. Types that were being printed specifically for users should receive a fmt::String implementation to fix this. Part of #20013 [breaking-change]
2015-01-05Replace #[phase] with #[plugin] / #[macro_use] / #[no_link]Keegan McAllister-2/+1
2014-10-29Rename fail! to panic!Steve Klabnik-2/+2
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-10-16Remove libdebug and update tests.Luqman Aden-2/+1
2014-06-09Use phase(plugin) in testsKeegan McAllister-1/+1
2014-05-27Move std::{reflect,repr,Poly} to a libdebug crateAlex Crichton-0/+1
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental. This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this. Closes #12019 [breaking-change]
2014-04-06Remove check-fast. Closes #4193, #8844, #6330, #7416Brian Anderson-1/+0
2014-04-04Fix inner attribute syntax from `#[foo];` to `#![foo]`Timothée Ravier-1/+1
From the 0.10 changelog: * The inner attribute syntax has changed from `#[foo];` to `#![foo]`.
2014-03-15log: Introduce liblog, the old std::loggingAlex Crichton-1/+5
This commit moves all logging out of the standard library into an external crate. This crate is the new crate which is responsible for all logging macros and logging implementation. A few reasons for this change are: * The crate map has always been a bit of a code smell among rust programs. It has difficulty being loaded on almost all platforms, and it's used almost exclusively for logging and only logging. Removing the crate map is one of the end goals of this movement. * The compiler has a fair bit of special support for logging. It has the __log_level() expression as well as generating a global word per module specifying the log level. This is unfairly favoring the built-in logging system, and is much better done purely in libraries instead of the compiler itself. * Initialization of logging is much easier to do if there is no reliance on a magical crate map being available to set module log levels. * If the logging library can be written outside of the standard library, there's no reason that it shouldn't be. It's likely that we're not going to build the highest quality logging library of all time, so third-party libraries should be able to provide just as high-quality logging systems as the default one provided in the rust distribution. With a migration such as this, the change does not come for free. There are some subtle changes in the behavior of liblog vs the previous logging macros: * The core change of this migration is that there is no longer a physical log-level per module. This concept is still emulated (it is quite useful), but there is now only a global log level, not a local one. This global log level is a reflection of the maximum of all log levels specified. The previously generated logging code looked like: if specified_level <= __module_log_level() { println!(...) } The newly generated code looks like: if specified_level <= ::log::LOG_LEVEL { if ::log::module_enabled(module_path!()) { println!(...) } } Notably, the first layer of checking is still intended to be "super fast" in that it's just a load of a global word and a compare. The second layer of checking is executed to determine if the current module does indeed have logging turned on. This means that if any module has a debug log level turned on, all modules with debug log levels get a little bit slower (they all do more expensive dynamic checks to determine if they're turned on or not). Semantically, this migration brings no change in this respect, but runtime-wise, this will have a perf impact on some code. * A `RUST_LOG=::help` directive will no longer print out a list of all modules that can be logged. This is because the crate map will no longer specify the log levels of all modules, so the list of modules is not known. Additionally, warnings can no longer be provided if a malformed logging directive was supplied. The new "hello world" for logging looks like: #[phase(syntax, link)] extern crate log; fn main() { debug!("Hello, world!"); }
2014-02-11Change `xfail` directives in compiletests to `ignore`, closes #11363Florian Hahn-2/+2
2014-01-03test: Make all the run-pass tests use `pub fn main`Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-10-22Drop the '2' suffix from logging macrosAlex Crichton-1/+1
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30rpass: Remove usage of fmt!Alex Crichton-1/+1
2013-09-20Invert --cfg debug to --cfg ndebugAlex Crichton-1/+2
Many people will be very confused that their debug! statements aren't working when they first use rust only to learn that they should have been building with `--cfg debug` the entire time. This inverts the meaning of the flag to instead of enabling debug statements, now it disables debug statements. This way the default behavior is a bit more reasonable, and requires less end-user configuration. Furthermore, this turns on debug by default when building the rustc compiler.
2013-07-16syntax: make a macros-injection pass; conditionally define debug! to a noop ↵Huon Wilson-0/+17
based on cfg(debug). Macros can be conditionally defined because stripping occurs before macro expansion, but, the built-in macros were only added as part of the actual expansion process and so couldn't be stripped to have definitions conditional on cfg flags. debug! is defined conditionally in terms of the debug config, expanding to nothing unless the --cfg debug flag is passed (to be precise it expands to `if false { normal_debug!(...) }` so that they are still type checked, and to avoid unused variable lints).