rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2019-07-27	tests: Move run-pass tests without naming conflicts to ui	Vadim Petrochenkov	-13/+0

2019-07-27	tests: Add missing run-pass annotations	Vadim Petrochenkov	-0/+1

2018-12-25	Remove licenses	Mark Rousskov	-10/+0

2015-04-08	Remove pretty-expanded from failing tests	Alex Crichton	-1/+0
	This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-03-26	Mass rename uint/int to usize/isize	Alex Crichton	-2/+2
	Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
2015-03-23	rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded	Brian Anderson	-0/+2
	Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2013-05-19	Use assert_eq! rather than assert! where possible	Corey Richardson	-2/+2

2013-03-29	librustc: Remove `fail_unless!`	Patrick Walton	-2/+2

2013-03-07	librustc: Convert all uses of `assert` over to `fail_unless!`	Patrick Walton	-2/+2

2013-02-01	check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree	Graydon Hoare	-1/+1

2013-01-26	testsuite: Eliminate uses of structural records from most run-pass tests	Tim Chevalier	-2/+6
	Except the pipes tests (that needs a snapshot)
2012-12-10	Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+10

2011-08-20	Reformat	Brian Anderson	-1/+1
	This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-03	Remove all xfail-stage0 directives	Brian Anderson	-5/+0
	While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27	Reformat for new syntax	Marijn Haverbeke	-2/+2

2011-07-26	Remove uses of tuples from the test suite	Marijn Haverbeke	-2/+2

2011-06-15	Reformat source tree (minus a couple tests that are still grumpy).	Graydon Hoare	-15/+8

2011-05-17	Return a better result from blocks. Closes issue #377	Brian Anderson	-0/+19
	Blocks return in a copy of the result of their ending expression, not the direct result of the ending expression, as that may be a local variable which gets zeroed by drop_slot.