rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2014-10-02	tests: remove uses of Gc.	Eduard Burtescu	-20/+0

2014-07-26	Remove managed_box gate from tests	Brian Anderson	-1/+0
	No longer does anything.
2014-06-14	rustc: Obsolete the `@` syntax entirely	Alex Crichton	-1/+3
	This removes all remnants of `@` pointers from rustc. Additionally, this removes the `GC` structure from the prelude as it seems odd exporting an experimental type in the prelude by default. Closes #14193 [breaking-change]
2014-04-14	Use new attribute syntax in python files in src/etc too (#13478)	Manish Goregaokar	-1/+1

2013-10-23	register snapshots	Daniel Micay	-0/+2

2013-08-17	Fix warnings it tests	Erick Tryzelaar	-1/+1

2013-05-19	Use assert_eq! rather than assert! where possible	Corey Richardson	-1/+1

2013-03-29	librustc: Remove `fail_unless!`	Patrick Walton	-1/+1

2013-03-07	librustc: Convert all uses of `assert` over to `fail_unless!`	Patrick Walton	-1/+1

2013-02-01	check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree	Graydon Hoare	-1/+1

2012-12-10	Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.	Graydon Hoare	-0/+10

2011-08-20	Reformat	Brian Anderson	-1/+1
	This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-12	Change some tests that used binop autoderef.	Michael Sullivan	-2/+2

2011-08-12	Convert most working tests to ivecs	Brian Anderson	-2/+2
	I tried to pay attention to what was actually being tested so, e.g. when I test was just using a vec as a boxed thing, I converted to boxed ints, etc. Haven't converted the macro tests yet. Not sure what to do there.
2011-08-03	Remove all xfail-stage0 directives	Brian Anderson	-5/+0
	While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-07-27	Reformat for new syntax	Marijn Haverbeke	-2/+2

2011-06-15	Reformat source tree (minus a couple tests that are still grumpy).	Graydon Hoare	-12/+7

2011-05-17	rustc: Run block cleanups on else if blocks	Brian Anderson	-0/+17
	With the scheme used to translate 'else if' currently the if expression is translated in a new (else) scope context. If that if expression wants to result in a value that requires refcounting then it will need to drop the refcount in the cleanups of the else block.