about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/expr-if-generic-box1.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2014-10-02tests: remove uses of Gc.Eduard Burtescu-26/+0
2014-07-26Remove managed_box gate from testsBrian Anderson-1/+0
No longer does anything.
2014-06-14rustc: Obsolete the `@` syntax entirelyAlex Crichton-5/+7
This removes all remnants of `@` pointers from rustc. Additionally, this removes the `GC` structure from the prelude as it seems odd exporting an experimental type in the prelude by default. Closes #14193 [breaking-change]
2014-04-14Use new attribute syntax in python files in src/etc too (#13478)Manish Goregaokar-1/+1
2014-04-06syntax: Tweak parsing lifetime bounds on closuresAlex Crichton-1/+1
In summary these are some example transitions this change makes: 'a || => ||: 'a proc:Send() => proc():Send The intended syntax for closures is to put the lifetime bound not at the front but rather in the list of bounds. Currently there is no official support in the AST for bounds that are not 'static, so this case is currently specially handled in the parser to desugar to what the AST is expecting. Additionally, this moves the bounds on procedures to the correct position, which is after the argument list. The current grammar for closures and procedures is: procedure := 'proc' [ '<' lifetime-list '>' ] '(' arg-list ')' [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ] closure := [ 'unsafe' ] ['<' lifetime-list '>' ] '|' arg-list '|' [ ':' bound-list ] [ '->' type ] lifetime-list := lifetime | lifetime ',' lifetime-list arg-list := ident ':' type | ident ':' type ',' arg-list bound-list := bound | bound '+' bound-list bound := path | lifetime This does not currently handle the << ambiguity in `Option<<'a>||>`, I am deferring that to a later patch. Additionally, this removes the support for the obsolete syntaxes of ~fn and &fn. Closes #10553 Closes #10767 Closes #11209 Closes #11210 Closes #11211
2013-11-26librustc: Remove remaining uses of `&fn()` in favor of `||`.Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-10-23register snapshotsDaniel Micay-3/+1
2013-09-23test: Fix rustdoc and tests.Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-03-29librustc: Remove `fail_unless!`Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-03-07librustc: Convert all uses of `assert` over to `fail_unless!`Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-03-02test: Remove `fn@`, `fn~`, and `fn&` from the test suite. rs=defunPatrick Walton-1/+1
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-08-01Convert ret to returnBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-06-20Remove bind. Issue #2189Brian Anderson-2/+1
2012-02-11make bind syntax unnecessary: just use _ for one of the argumentsNiko Matsakis-1/+1
2011-10-20Make fn denote a bare function. Convert fn to fn@ as neededBrian Anderson-1/+1
2011-09-12Reformat for new mode syntax, step 1Marijn Haverbeke-1/+1
Long lines were fixed in a very crude way, as I'll be following up with another reformat in a bit.
2011-08-20ReformatBrian Anderson-1/+1
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to [] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-16Port the tests to the expr foo::<T> syntax.Erick Tryzelaar-1/+1
2011-08-16Port the tests to the decl foo<T> syntax.Erick Tryzelaar-2/+2
2011-08-16Port the tests to the typaram foo<T> syntax.Erick Tryzelaar-2/+2
2011-07-27Reformat for new syntaxMarijn Haverbeke-4/+4
2011-06-15Reformat source tree (minus a couple tests that are still grumpy).Graydon Hoare-12/+10
2011-05-14Remove xfail-boot lines from testsBrian Anderson-1/+0
2011-05-02Un-revert "Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate", fixing ↵Patrick Walton-1/+1
the problem. This reverts commit d08b443fffb1181d8d45ae5d061412f202dd4118.
2011-05-02Revert "Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestate"Graydon Hoare-1/+1
This reverts commit aa25f22f197682de3b18fc4c8ba068d1feda220f. It broke stage2, not sure why yet.
2011-05-02Use different syntax for checks that matter to typestateTim Chevalier-1/+1
This giant commit changes the syntax of Rust to use "assert" for "check" expressions that didn't mean anything to the typestate system, and continue using "check" for checks that are used as part of typestate checking. Most of the changes are just replacing "check" with "assert" in test cases and rustc.
2011-04-07Make block results work for generic typesBrian Anderson-0/+21
I think just about every type can be used as a block result now. There's quite a proliferation of tests here, but they all test slightly different things and some are split out to remain XFAILed. The tests of generic vectors are still XFAILed because generic aliased boxes still don't work in general.