about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/generic-alias-unique.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2018-09-06Migrated slew of run-pass tests to various subdirectories of `ui/run-pass/`.Felix S. Klock II-20/+0
2018-08-05Convert unknown_features lint into an errorvarkor-1/+0
2015-03-26Mass rename uint/int to usize/isizeAlex Crichton-1/+1
Now that support has been removed, all lingering use cases are renamed.
2015-03-03Add `: Box<_>` or `::Box<_>` type annotations to various places.Felix S. Klock II-1/+1
This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to accommodate overloaded-`box`. ---- Note that this is not *all* of the changes necessary to accommodate Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry type ascription. (For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.) ---- There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done in coerce-match-calls.rs. ---- Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
2015-01-30Remove all `i` suffixesTobias Bucher-1/+1
2015-01-08fallout: run-pass tests that use box. (many could be ported to `Box::new` ↵Felix S. Klock II-0/+3
instead in the future.)
2014-10-16Remove libdebug and update tests.Luqman Aden-3/+1
2014-06-24librustc: Remove the fallback to `int` from typechecking.Niko Matsakis-1/+1
This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are: * `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`; * `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`; * `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`. RFC #30. Closes #6023. [breaking-change]
2014-05-27Move std::{reflect,repr,Poly} to a libdebug crateAlex Crichton-0/+1
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental. This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this. Closes #12019 [breaking-change]
2014-05-06librustc: Remove `~EXPR`, `~TYPE`, and `~PAT` from the language, exceptPatrick Walton-3/+2
for `~str`/`~[]`. Note that `~self` still remains, since I forgot to add support for `Box<self>` before the snapshot. How to update your code: * Instead of `~EXPR`, you should write `box EXPR`. * Instead of `~TYPE`, you should write `Box<Type>`. * Instead of `~PATTERN`, you should write `box PATTERN`. [breaking-change]
2014-03-15log: Introduce liblog, the old std::loggingAlex Crichton-1/+1
This commit moves all logging out of the standard library into an external crate. This crate is the new crate which is responsible for all logging macros and logging implementation. A few reasons for this change are: * The crate map has always been a bit of a code smell among rust programs. It has difficulty being loaded on almost all platforms, and it's used almost exclusively for logging and only logging. Removing the crate map is one of the end goals of this movement. * The compiler has a fair bit of special support for logging. It has the __log_level() expression as well as generating a global word per module specifying the log level. This is unfairly favoring the built-in logging system, and is much better done purely in libraries instead of the compiler itself. * Initialization of logging is much easier to do if there is no reliance on a magical crate map being available to set module log levels. * If the logging library can be written outside of the standard library, there's no reason that it shouldn't be. It's likely that we're not going to build the highest quality logging library of all time, so third-party libraries should be able to provide just as high-quality logging systems as the default one provided in the rust distribution. With a migration such as this, the change does not come for free. There are some subtle changes in the behavior of liblog vs the previous logging macros: * The core change of this migration is that there is no longer a physical log-level per module. This concept is still emulated (it is quite useful), but there is now only a global log level, not a local one. This global log level is a reflection of the maximum of all log levels specified. The previously generated logging code looked like: if specified_level <= __module_log_level() { println!(...) } The newly generated code looks like: if specified_level <= ::log::LOG_LEVEL { if ::log::module_enabled(module_path!()) { println!(...) } } Notably, the first layer of checking is still intended to be "super fast" in that it's just a load of a global word and a compare. The second layer of checking is executed to determine if the current module does indeed have logging turned on. This means that if any module has a debug log level turned on, all modules with debug log levels get a little bit slower (they all do more expensive dynamic checks to determine if they're turned on or not). Semantically, this migration brings no change in this respect, but runtime-wise, this will have a perf impact on some code. * A `RUST_LOG=::help` directive will no longer print out a list of all modules that can be logged. This is because the crate map will no longer specify the log levels of all modules, so the list of modules is not known. Additionally, warnings can no longer be provided if a malformed logging directive was supplied. The new "hello world" for logging looks like: #[phase(syntax, link)] extern crate log; fn main() { debug!("Hello, world!"); }
2013-10-22Drop the '2' suffix from logging macrosAlex Crichton-1/+1
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30rpass: Remove usage of fmt!Alex Crichton-1/+1
2013-07-17librustc: Remove all uses of the `Copy` bound.Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-07-17Clean-up tests after debug!/std-macros change.Huon Wilson-1/+1
The entire testsuite is converted to using info! rather than debug! because some depend on the code within the debug! being trans'd.
2013-06-28librustc: Change "Owned" to "Send" everywherePatrick Walton-1/+1
2013-05-19Use assert_eq! rather than assert! where possibleCorey Richardson-1/+1
2013-03-29librustc: Remove `fail_unless!`Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-03-15Clonify some of run-passBen Striegel-1/+1
2013-03-11Remove uses of logBrian Anderson-1/+1
2013-03-07librustc: Convert all uses of `assert` over to `fail_unless!`Patrick Walton-1/+1
2013-02-20librustc: Separate most trait bounds with '+'. rs=plussingPatrick Walton-1/+1
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2012-12-13Rename Send trait to OwnedBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-12-05test: Fix a bunch of test cases. rs=burningPatrick Walton-1/+1
2012-09-07Convert all kind bounds to camel case. Remove send, owned keywords.Brian Anderson-1/+1
2012-08-01Convert ret to returnBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-05-22Send is no longer a subkind of copy. This allows for sendable, but ↵Eric Holk-1/+1
non-copyable resources. Closes #2420.
2012-01-05Switch to new param kind bound syntaxMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
And remove support for the old syntax
2011-12-22Register new snapshots, purge log_err and log_full in favour of log(...).Graydon Hoare-1/+1
2011-12-22Register snapshots and switch logging over to use of log_full or #error / ↵Graydon Hoare-1/+1
#debug.
2011-11-18Update stdlib, compiler, and tests to new kind systemMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
This involved adding 'copy' to more generics than I hoped, but an experiment with making it implicit showed that that way lies madness -- unless enforced, you will not remember to mark functions that don't copy as not requiring copyable kind. Issue #1177
2011-10-28Move to short kind kinds words in test suiteMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
Issue #1076
2011-10-25Update our code to new type parameter kind syntaxMarijn Haverbeke-1/+1
Closes #1067
2011-09-23Create a bunch of test cases for unique boxes by copying box testsBrian Anderson-0/+10
XFAIL the ones that don't work Issue #409