| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit deletes the in-tree `getopts` crate in favor of the crates.io-based
`getopts` crate. The main difference here is with a new builder-style API, but
otherwise everything else remains relatively standard.
|
|
Most of the Rust community agrees that the vec! macro is clearer when
called using square brackets [] instead of regular brackets (). Most of
these ocurrences are from before macros allowed using different types of
brackets.
There is one left unchanged in a pretty-print test, as the pretty
printer still wants it to have regular brackets.
|
|
This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic!
one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
|
|
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile.
This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221
The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when
writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the
possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot
because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak
of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other
circumlocutions.
Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when
operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate
out a section describing the "Err-producing" case.
We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as
an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology
accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe.
To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead.
Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this
will work on UNIX based systems:
grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g'
You can of course also do this by hand.
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
This obsoletes the old `to_err_msg` method. Replace
println!("Error: {}", failure.to_err_msg())
let string = failure.to_err_msg();
with
println!("Error: {}", failure)
let string = failure.to_str();
[breaking-change]
|
|
This commit moves reflection (as well as the {:?} format modifier) to a new
libdebug crate, all of which is marked experimental.
This is a breaking change because it now requires the debug crate to be
explicitly linked if the :? format qualifier is used. This means that any code
using this feature will have to add `extern crate debug;` to the top of the
crate. Any code relying on reflection will also need to do this.
Closes #12019
[breaking-change]
|
|
|
|
(And fix some tests.)
|
|
`~[T]` in test, libgetopts, compiletest, librustdoc, and libnum.
|
|
|
|
This was previously implemented, and it just needed a snapshot to go through
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some minor api and doc adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change the opt_ functions in getopts to take a reference to a
Matches, instead of taking a Matches by-value, as suggested in
|
