about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/issue-3012-2.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2018-09-06Migrated slew of run-pass tests to various subdirectories of `ui/run-pass/`.Felix S. Klock II-22/+0
2017-11-19std: Add a new wasm32-unknown-unknown targetAlex Crichton-6/+2
This commit adds a new target to the compiler: wasm32-unknown-unknown. This target is a reimagining of what it looks like to generate WebAssembly code from Rust. Instead of using Emscripten which can bring with it a weighty runtime this instead is a target which uses only the LLVM backend for WebAssembly and a "custom linker" for now which will hopefully one day be direct calls to lld. Notable features of this target include: * There is zero runtime footprint. The target assumes nothing exists other than the wasm32 instruction set. * There is zero toolchain footprint beyond adding the target. No custom linker is needed, rustc contains everything. * Very small wasm modules can be generated directly from Rust code using this target. * Most of the standard library is stubbed out to return an error, but anything related to allocation works (aka `HashMap`, `Vec`, etc). * Naturally, any `#[no_std]` crate should be 100% compatible with this new target. This target is currently somewhat janky due to how linking works. The "linking" is currently unconditional whole program LTO (aka LLVM is being used as a linker). Naturally that means compiling programs is pretty slow! Eventually though this target should have a linker. This target is also intended to be quite experimental. I'm hoping that this can act as a catalyst for further experimentation in Rust with WebAssembly. Breaking changes are very likely to land to this target, so it's not recommended to rely on it in any critical capacity yet. We'll let you know when it's "production ready". --- Currently testing-wise this target is looking pretty good but isn't complete. I've got almost the entire `run-pass` test suite working with this target (lots of tests ignored, but many passing as well). The `core` test suite is still getting LLVM bugs fixed to get that working and will take some time. Relatively simple programs all seem to work though! --- It's worth nothing that you may not immediately see the "smallest possible wasm module" for the input you feed to rustc. For various reasons it's very difficult to get rid of the final "bloat" in vanilla rustc (again, a real linker should fix all this). For now what you'll have to do is: cargo install --git https://github.com/alexcrichton/wasm-gc wasm-gc foo.wasm bar.wasm And then `bar.wasm` should be the smallest we can get it! --- In any case for now I'd love feedback on this, particularly on the various integration points if you've got better ideas of how to approach them!
2015-03-23rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expandedBrian Anderson-0/+2
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2015-03-23Require feature attributes, and add them where necessaryBrian Anderson-1/+1
2015-03-03Add `: Box<_>` or `::Box<_>` type annotations to various places.Felix S. Klock II-1/+1
This is the kind of change that one is expected to need to make to accommodate overloaded-`box`. ---- Note that this is not *all* of the changes necessary to accommodate Issue 22181. It is merely the subset of those cases where there was already a let-binding in place that made it easy to add the necesasry type ascription. (For unnamed intermediate `Box` values, one must go down a different route; `Box::new` is the option that maximizes portability, but has potential inefficiency depending on whether the call is inlined.) ---- There is one place worth note, `run-pass/coerce-match.rs`, where I used an ugly form of `Box<_>` type ascription where I would have preferred to use `Box::new` to accommodate overloaded-`box`. I deliberately did not use `Box::new` here, because that is already done in coerce-match-calls.rs. ---- Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181.
2015-01-08fallout: run-pass tests that use box. (many could be ported to `Box::new` ↵Felix S. Klock II-0/+2
instead in the future.)
2014-10-02tests: remove uses of Gc.Eduard Burtescu-2/+1
2014-07-26Remove managed_box gate from testsBrian Anderson-1/+0
No longer does anything.
2014-06-14rustc: Obsolete the `@` syntax entirelyAlex Crichton-1/+2
This removes all remnants of `@` pointers from rustc. Additionally, this removes the `GC` structure from the prelude as it seems odd exporting an experimental type in the prelude by default. Closes #14193 [breaking-change]
2014-04-14Use new attribute syntax in python files in src/etc too (#13478)Manish Goregaokar-1/+1
2014-04-06Remove check-fast. Closes #4193, #8844, #6330, #7416Brian Anderson-1/+0
2014-04-04Fix fallout from std::libc separationCorey Richardson-1/+1
2014-02-14extern mod => extern crateAlex Crichton-1/+1
This was previously implemented, and it just needed a snapshot to go through
2014-02-11Change `xfail` directives in compiletests to `ignore`, closes #11363Florian Hahn-2/+2
2013-12-12Gate literal box expressions in addition to typesAlex Crichton-0/+3
Closes #10920
2013-08-17Fix warnings it testsErick Tryzelaar-1/+1
2013-05-29librustc: Stop reexporting the standard modules from prelude.Patrick Walton-0/+2
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-09-11Convert 'use' to 'extern mod'. Remove old 'use' syntaxBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-09-05test: "import" -> "use"Patrick Walton-1/+1
2012-08-16xfail-fast issue 3012-2Graydon Hoare-0/+1
2012-08-15Test case for #3012Tim Chevalier-0/+8