about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/paths-containing-nul.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2019-07-27tests: Move run-pass tests without naming conflicts to uiVadim Petrochenkov-50/+0
2019-07-27tests: Add missing run-pass annotationsVadim Petrochenkov-0/+2
2019-05-16Added ignore-sgx for appropriate testsDario Gonzalez-0/+1
2019-03-23fs::copy() set file mode earlyHarald Hoyer-4/+9
A convenience method like fs::copy() should try to prevent pitfalls a normal user doesn't think about. In case of an empty umask, setting the file mode early prevents temporarily world readable or even writeable files, because the default mode is 0o666. In case the target is a named pipe or special device node, setting the file mode can lead to unwanted side effects, like setting permissons on `/dev/stdout` or for root setting permissions on `/dev/null`. copy_file_range() returns EINVAL, if the destination is a FIFO/pipe or a device like "/dev/null", so fallback to io::copy, too. Use `fcopyfile` on MacOS instead of `copyfile`. Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/26933 Fixed: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37885
2018-12-25Remove licensesMark Rousskov-10/+0
2018-09-21Allow various lints as part of ui-ifying `src/test/run-pass` suite.Felix S. Klock II-0/+1
2018-01-02Add 'ignore-cloudabi' to tests that don't and won't build on CloudABI.Ed Schouten-0/+1
It looks like many of these tests are already disabled on emscripten, which also doesn't seem to support environment variables and subprocess spawning. Just add a similar tag for CloudABI. While there, sort some of the lists of operating systems alphabetically.
2017-11-19std: Add a new wasm32-unknown-unknown targetAlex Crichton-0/+2
This commit adds a new target to the compiler: wasm32-unknown-unknown. This target is a reimagining of what it looks like to generate WebAssembly code from Rust. Instead of using Emscripten which can bring with it a weighty runtime this instead is a target which uses only the LLVM backend for WebAssembly and a "custom linker" for now which will hopefully one day be direct calls to lld. Notable features of this target include: * There is zero runtime footprint. The target assumes nothing exists other than the wasm32 instruction set. * There is zero toolchain footprint beyond adding the target. No custom linker is needed, rustc contains everything. * Very small wasm modules can be generated directly from Rust code using this target. * Most of the standard library is stubbed out to return an error, but anything related to allocation works (aka `HashMap`, `Vec`, etc). * Naturally, any `#[no_std]` crate should be 100% compatible with this new target. This target is currently somewhat janky due to how linking works. The "linking" is currently unconditional whole program LTO (aka LLVM is being used as a linker). Naturally that means compiling programs is pretty slow! Eventually though this target should have a linker. This target is also intended to be quite experimental. I'm hoping that this can act as a catalyst for further experimentation in Rust with WebAssembly. Breaking changes are very likely to land to this target, so it's not recommended to rely on it in any critical capacity yet. We'll let you know when it's "production ready". --- Currently testing-wise this target is looking pretty good but isn't complete. I've got almost the entire `run-pass` test suite working with this target (lots of tests ignored, but many passing as well). The `core` test suite is still getting LLVM bugs fixed to get that working and will take some time. Relatively simple programs all seem to work though! --- It's worth nothing that you may not immediately see the "smallest possible wasm module" for the input you feed to rustc. For various reasons it's very difficult to get rid of the final "bloat" in vanilla rustc (again, a real linker should fix all this). For now what you'll have to do is: cargo install --git https://github.com/alexcrichton/wasm-gc wasm-gc foo.wasm bar.wasm And then `bar.wasm` should be the smallest we can get it! --- In any case for now I'd love feedback on this, particularly on the various integration points if you've got better ideas of how to approach them!
2015-11-19Add run-pass test for paths containing the NUL characterTobias Bucher-0/+48