about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/src/test/run-pass/unreachable-code-1.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2019-07-27tests: Move run-pass tests without naming conflicts to uiVadim Petrochenkov-19/+0
2019-07-27tests: Add missing run-pass annotationsVadim Petrochenkov-0/+2
2018-12-25Remove licensesMark Rousskov-10/+0
2018-09-21Allow various lints as part of ui-ifying `src/test/run-pass` suite.Felix S. Klock II-0/+2
2016-08-22Fix compiletest so it respects warnings for run-pass.Ahmed Charles-2/+2
2016-08-13Ensure that attributes are spelled properly.Ahmed Charles-1/+1
2015-04-08Remove pretty-expanded from failing testsAlex Crichton-1/+0
This commit removes pretty-expanded from all tests that wind up calling panic! one way or another now that its internals are unstable.
2015-03-23rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expandedBrian Anderson-0/+2
Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work.
2014-10-29Rename fail! to panic!Steve Klabnik-1/+1
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/221 The current terminology of "task failure" often causes problems when writing or speaking about code. You often want to talk about the possibility of an operation that returns a Result "failing", but cannot because of the ambiguity with task failure. Instead, you have to speak of "the failing case" or "when the operation does not succeed" or other circumlocutions. Likewise, we use a "Failure" header in rustdoc to describe when operations may fail the task, but it would often be helpful to separate out a section describing the "Err-producing" case. We have been steadily moving away from task failure and toward Result as an error-handling mechanism, so we should optimize our terminology accordingly: Result-producing functions should be easy to describe. To update your code, rename any call to `fail!` to `panic!` instead. Assuming you have not created your own macro named `panic!`, this will work on UNIX based systems: grep -lZR 'fail!' . | xargs -0 -l sed -i -e 's/fail!/panic!/g' You can of course also do this by hand. [breaking-change]
2014-04-14Use new attribute syntax in python files in src/etc too (#13478)Manish Goregaokar-2/+2
2013-10-22Drop the '2' suffix from logging macrosAlex Crichton-1/+1
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-09-30rpass: Remove usage of fmt!Alex Crichton-1/+1
2013-08-17Fix warnings it testsErick Tryzelaar-0/+2
2013-02-15tests/tutorials: Get rid of `move`.Luqman Aden-1/+1
2013-02-13Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3Nick Desaulniers-1/+1
2013-02-01check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtreeGraydon Hoare-1/+1
2013-01-31Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macroNick Desaulniers-1/+1
2012-12-10Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.Graydon Hoare-0/+10
2012-10-30Remove xfail-pretty from tests that pretty-print correctly nowTim Chevalier-1/+0
2012-10-23Remove uses of binary move - <- - from tests and librariesTim Chevalier-1/+1
2012-08-01Convert ret to returnBrian Anderson-1/+1
2012-06-30change the test suite `//! kind` syntax to `//~ kind` in order to avoid aGareth Daniel Smith-1/+1
conflict with the new single-line-sugared-inner-doc-comment (`//! ...`).
2012-04-30Stop inferring bot/static when types/regions are unconstrained.Niko Matsakis-0/+13
Also, some other changes that came up along the way: - add a 'blk' region for the current block. - detect unused type/region variables.