rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2023-01-11	Move /src/test to /tests	Albert Larsan	-52/+0

2022-10-01	bless rustdoc-ui	Maybe Waffle	-1/+1

2022-09-12	Feature gate the rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples lint	Wim Looman	-6/+6

2022-03-25	Bless rustdoc tests.	Camille GILLOT	-5/+0

2021-03-05	Rename `rustdoc` to `rustdoc::all`	Joshua Nelson	-6/+6
	When rustdoc lints were changed to be tool lints, the `rustdoc` group was removed, leading to spurious warnings like ``` warning: unknown lint: `rustdoc` ``` The lint group still worked when rustdoc ran, since rustdoc added the group itself. This renames the group to `rustdoc::all` for consistency with `clippy::all` and the rest of the rustdoc lints.
2021-03-01	Rename rustdoc lints to be a tool lint instead of built-in.	Joshua Nelson	-2/+2
	- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` - Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors - Register lints even when running doctests Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored. - Register all existing lints as removed This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call `register_removed` directly instead. - Fix fallout + Rustdoc lints for compiler/ + Rustdoc lints for library/ Note that this does not suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for `rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time when the latter was valid.
2020-11-12	Ensure that INVALID_CODEBLOCK_ATTRIBUTES lint is emitted	Guillaume Gomez	-26/+34

2020-11-12	Add tests for rustdoc --check option	Guillaume Gomez	-0/+49