rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2023-01-11	Move /src/test to /tests	Albert Larsan	-185/+0

2022-09-19	rustdoc: update test cases for changed item-decl HTML	Michael Howell	-1/+1

2022-08-13	rustdoc: Fix incorrect usage of `@!has` and `@!matches`	Noah Lev	-2/+2
	`@!has` (and `@!matches`) with two arguments used to treat the second argument as a literal string of HTML code. Now, that feature has been renamed into `@!hasraw` (and `@!matchesraw`), and the arity-2 `@!has` version is an error. These uses thought the second argument was being treated as an XPath, as with the arity-3 version, but in fact was being treated as literal HTML. Because these were checking for the absence of the string, the tests silently did nothing -- an XPath string won't ever be showing up in the test's generated HTML!
2022-08-13	Update `@!has` name in tests	Noah Lev	-2/+2

2022-01-09	Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted"	Noah Lev	-1/+1
	Also: * Always use `/* /` block comments Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing with "some" When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//` and sometimes uses `/` comments for these messages, so this change makes them all use `/`. Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but `doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include this under the category of "private fields".
2021-10-18	* Remove left margin on items declaration at the top of their documentation page	Guillaume Gomez	-1/+1
	* Rename "type-decl" into "item-decl" to reflect the change of usage
2021-07-26	Add test for enum item tuple fields documentation	Guillaume Gomez	-2/+2

2021-07-22	Don't hide fields of enum struct variants	Noah Lev	-4/+2
	* The toggle adds visual clutter * It's easy to miss that there are fields * Tuple variant fields are always shown, so it is inconsistent to hide struct variant fields * It's annoying to have to click the toggle every time
2021-07-11	rustdoc: test count of item contents when hidden	Weihang Lo	-7/+38

2021-05-30	Remove toggle for "undocumented items."	Jacob Hoffman-Andrews	-0/+156
	Per discussion in #84326. For trait implementations, this was misleading: the items actually do have documentation (but it comes from the trait definition). For both trait implementations and trait implementors, this was redundant: in both of those cases, the items are default-hidden by different toggle at the level above. Update tests: Remove XPath selectors that over-specified on details tag, in cases that weren't testing toggles. Add an explicit test for toggles on methods. Rename item-hide-threshold to toggle-item-contents for consistency.