| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
available
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently we skip deriving `PartialEq::ne` for C-like (fieldless) enums
and empty structs, thus reyling on the default `ne`. This behaviour is
unnecessarily conservative, because the `PartialEq` docs say this:
> Implementations must ensure that eq and ne are consistent with each other:
>
> `a != b` if and only if `!(a == b)` (ensured by the default
> implementation).
This means that the default implementation (`!(a == b)`) is always good
enough. So this commit changes things such that `ne` is never derived.
The motivation for this change is that not deriving `ne` reduces compile
times and binary sizes.
Observable behaviour may change if a user has defined a type `A` with an
inconsistent `PartialEq` and then defines a type `B` that contains an
`A` and also derives `PartialEq`. Such code is already buggy and
preserving bug-for-bug compatibility isn't necessary.
Two side-effects of the change:
- There is only one error message produced for types where `PartialEq`
cannot be derived, instead of two.
- For coverage reports, some warnings about generated `ne` methods not
being executed have disappeared.
Both side-effects seem fine, and possibly preferable.
|
|
This error message is about `derive` and `packed`, but E0133 is for
"Unsafe code was used outside of an unsafe function or block".
|
|
There are two errors involving `derive` and `packed`.
```
`#[derive]` can't be derived on a `#[repr(packed)]` struct with type or const parameters
`#[derive]` can't be derived on a `#[repr(packed)]` struct that does not derive Copy
```
The second one overstates things. It is possible to use derive on a
repr(packed) struct that doesn't derive Copy in two cases.
- If all the fields within the struct meet the required alignment: 1 for
`repr(packed)`, or `N` for `repr(packed(N))`.
- If `Default` is the only trait derived.
This commit improves things in a few ways.
- Changes the errors to say `$TRAIT can't be derived on this ...`.
This is more accurate, because it's just $TRAIT and *this* packed
struct that are a problem, not *all* derived traits on *all* packed
structs.
- Adds more details to the "ERROR" lines in the test case, enough to
distinguish between the two error messages.
- Adds more cases to the test case that don't cause errors, e.g. `Default`
derives.
- Uses a wider variety of builtin traits in the test case, for better coverage.
|
|
Suggest adding a `?Sized` bound if appropriate on E0599 by inspecting
the HIR Generics. (Fix #98539)
|
|
Shorten def_span for more items.
The `def_span` query only returns the signature span for functions.
Struct/enum/union definitions can also have a very long body.
This PR shortens the associated span.
|
|
|
|
Rewrite dead-code pass to avoid fetching HIR.
This allows to get a more uniform handling of spans, and to simplify the grouping of diagnostics for variants and fields.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Point to type parameter definition when not finding variant, method and associated item
fixes #77391
|
|
|
|
use `def_ident_span` , `body_owner_def_id` instead of `in_progress_typeck_results`, `guess_head_span`
use `body_id.owner` directly
add description to label
|
|
r=estebank
Collapse multiple dead code warnings into a single diagnostic
closes #97643
|
|
|
|
add comments in `store_dead_field_or_variant`
support multiple log level
add a item ident label
fix ui tests
fix a ui test
fix a rustdoc ui test
use let chain
refactor: remove `store_dead_field_or_variant`
fix a tiny bug
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide more context when denying invalid type params
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attempts to improve method name suggestions when a matching method name
is not found. The approach taken is use the Levenshtein distance and
account for substrings having a high distance but can sometimes be very
close to the intended method (eg. empty vs is_empty).
|
|
Instead of probing for all possible impls that could have caused an
`ImplObligation`, keep track of its `DefId` and obligation spans for
accurate error reporting.
Follow up to #89580. Addresses #89418.
Remove some unnecessary clones.
Tweak output for auto trait impl obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix duplicate derive clone suggestion
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91492
The addition of:
```rust
derives.sort();
derives.dedup();
```
is what actually solves the problem.
The rest is just cleanup.
I want to improve the diagnostic message to provide the suggestion as a proper diff but ran into some problems, so I'll attempt that again in a follow up PR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tidy run
update invalid crate attributes, improve error
update test outputs
de-capitalise error
update tests
Update invalid crate attributes, add help message
Update - generate span without using BytePos
Add correct dependancies
Update - generate suggestion without BytePos
Tidy run
update tests
Generate Suggestion without BytePos
Add all builtin attributes
add err builtin inner attr at top of crate
fix tests
add err builtin inner attr at top of crate
tidy fix
add err builtin inner attr at top of crate
|
|
Group obligations by `impl` block that introduced them.
|
|
|
|
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
Address part of #89418.
|
|
references
When suggesting references, substitutions were being forgotten and some types were misused. This led to at
least one ICE and other incorrectly emitted diagnostics. This has been fixed; in some cases this leads to
diagnostics changing, and tests have been adjusted.
|
|
This reverts commit 36a1076d24697621a3bb67ef654b4eb79647aa54, reversing
changes made to e1e9319d93aea755c444c8f8ff863b0936d7a4b6.
|
|
|
|
When encountering a binop where the types would have been accepted, if
all the predicates had been fulfilled, include information about the
predicates and suggest appropriate `#[derive]`s if possible.
Point at trait(s) that needs to be `impl`emented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
