rust - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Lines
2023-01-11	Move /src/test to /tests	Albert Larsan	-23/+0

2022-09-03	Include enum path in variant suggestion	Michael Goulet	-3/+3

2022-03-08	Change wording of suggestion to add missing `match` arm	Esteban Kuber	-1/+1

2022-03-08	Point at uncovered variants in enum definition in `note` instead of a ↵	Esteban Kuber	-9/+9
	`span_label` This makes the order of the output always consistent: 1. Place of the `match` missing arms 2. The `enum` definition span 3. The structured suggestion to add a fallthrough arm
2022-03-08	When finding a match expr with a single arm that requires more, suggest it	Esteban Kuber	-1/+5
	Given ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} } ``` suggest ```rust match Some(42) { Some(0) => {} None \| Some(_) => todo!(), } ```
2022-03-08	When encountering a match expr with no arms, suggest it	Esteban Kuber	-1/+1
	Given ```rust match Some(42) {} ``` suggest ```rust match Some(42) { None \| Some(_) => todo!(), } ```
2020-03-27	non-exhastive diagnostic: add note re. scrutinee type	Mazdak Farrokhzad	-0/+1

2019-03-11	Update tests	Vadim Petrochenkov	-1/+1

2019-03-02	Point at enum definition when match patterns are not exhaustive	Esteban Küber	-2/+11
	``` error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty --> file.rs:9:11 \| 1 \| / enum X { 2 \| \| A, \| \| - variant not covered 3 \| \| B, \| \| - variant not covered 4 \| \| C, \| \| - variant not covered 5 \| \| } \| \|_- `X` defined here ... 9 \| match x { \| ^ \| = help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered --> file.rs:11:11 \| 1 \| / enum X { 2 \| \| A, 3 \| \| B, 4 \| \| C, \| \| - not covered 5 \| \| } \| \|_- `X` defined here ... 11 \| match x { \| ^ patterns `C` not covered ``` When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant, point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing pattern is due to a field's enum variants: ``` enum E1 { A, B, C, } enum E2 { A(E1), B, } fn foo() { match E2::A(E1::A) { E2::A(E1::B) => {} E2::B => {} } //~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled } ``` Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns. Fix #37518.
2018-12-25	Remove licenses	Mark Rousskov	-1/+1

2018-03-14	update tests	Guillaume Gomez	-1/+1

2018-02-26	Update UI tests	Vadim Petrochenkov	-1/+1

2018-02-25	Update ui tests	Guillaume Gomez	-0/+1

2018-02-08	Move some E0XXX to `ui`	Esteban Küber	-0/+8