| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-11 | Move /src/test to /tests | Albert Larsan | -63/+0 | |
| 2022-10-05 | Delay function resolution error until typeck | Michael Goulet | -11/+11 | |
| 2022-06-16 | fix one more case of trailing space | klensy | -1/+1 | |
| 2021-08-11 | Modify structured suggestion output | Esteban Küber | -5/+5 | |
| * On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format * When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline * Color highlight modified span | ||||
| 2020-08-10 | Add missing primary label | Esteban Küber | -1/+1 | |
| 2020-08-10 | Tweak ordering of suggestions | Esteban Küber | -4/+7 | |
| Modify logic to make it easier to follow and recover labels that would otherwise be lost. | ||||
| 2020-07-14 | Suggest struct pat on incorrect unit or tuple pat | Esteban Küber | -6/+9 | |
| When encountering a unit or tuple pattern for a struct-like item, suggest using the correct pattern. Use `insert_field_names_local` when evaluating variants and store field names even when the list is empty in order to produce accurate structured suggestions. | ||||
| 2020-04-26 | Tweak some suggestions in `rustc_resolve` | Esteban Küber | -3/+6 | |
| 2020-03-21 | Bless tests | LeSeulArtichaut | -12/+9 | |
| 2019-10-27 | Point at local similarly named element and tweak references to variants | Esteban Küber | -8/+14 | |
| Point at the span for the definition of ADTs internal to the current crate. Look at the leading char of the ident to determine whether we're expecting a likely fn or any of a fn, a tuple struct or a tuple variant. Turn fn `add_typo_suggestion` into a `Resolver` method. | ||||
| 2019-10-24 | Increase spacing for suggestions in diagnostics | Esteban Küber | -0/+2 | |
| Make the spacing between the code snippet and verbose structured suggestions consistent with note and help messages. | ||||
| 2019-10-13 | Bring attention to suggestions when the only difference is capitalization | Esteban Küber | -1/+1 | |
| 2019-09-22 | Point at definition when misusing ADT | Esteban Küber | -0/+3 | |
| When given `struct Foo(usize)` and using it as `Foo {}` or `Foo`, point at `Foo`'s definition in the error. | ||||
| 2019-05-02 | fix typo | Esteban Küber | -2/+2 | |
| 2019-04-19 | Emit specific error for struct literal in conditions | Esteban Küber | -39/+15 | |
| 2019-03-22 | Reword type ascription note to reduce verbosity | Esteban Küber | -12/+2 | |
| 2019-03-22 | Review comment | Esteban Küber | -2/+2 | |
| 2019-03-22 | Expand suggestions for type ascription parse errors | Esteban Küber | -0/+26 | |
| 2019-03-11 | Update tests | Vadim Petrochenkov | -1/+1 | |
| 2019-01-18 | Rollup merge of #57725 - estebank:parens, r=michaelwoerister | Mazdak Farrokhzad | -3/+9 | |
| Use structured suggestion to surround struct literal with parenthesis | ||||
| 2019-01-17 | Use structured suggestion to surround struct literal with parenthesis | Esteban Küber | -3/+9 | |
| 2019-01-09 | clarify resolve typo suggestion | Andy Russell | -1/+1 | |
| Include the kind of the binding that we're suggesting, and use a structured suggestion. | ||||
| 2018-12-25 | Remove licenses | Mark Rousskov | -7/+7 | |
| 2018-06-04 | Suggest braces when a struct literal needs them | Esteban Küber | -2/+41 | |
| When writing a struct literal in an expression that expects a block to be started afterwards (like an `if` statement), do not suggest using the same struct literal: ``` did you mean `S { /* fields * /}`? ``` Instead, suggest surrounding the expression with parentheses: ``` did you mean `(S { /* fields * /})`? ``` | ||||
| 2018-03-14 | update tests | Guillaume Gomez | -1/+1 | |
| 2018-02-26 | Update UI tests | Vadim Petrochenkov | -1/+1 | |
| 2018-02-25 | Update ui tests | Guillaume Gomez | -0/+1 | |
| 2018-02-08 | Move some E0XXX to `ui` | Esteban Küber | -0/+8 | |
