| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Fixes #73159
This is similar to #69350 - if the user didn't initially
write out a 'static lifetime, adding 'static in response to
a lifetime error is usually the wrong thing to do.
|
|
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Handle type ascription type ops in NLL HRTB diagnostics
Currently, there are still a few cases of the "higher-ranked subtype error" of yore, 4 of which are related to type ascription.
This PR is a follow-up to #86700, adding support for type ascription type ops, and makes 3 of these tests output the same diagnostics in NLL mode as the migrate mode (and 1 is now much closer, especially if you ignore that it already outputs an additional error in NLL mode -- which could be a duplicate caused by a lack of normalization like [these comments point out](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs#L122-L157), or an imprecision in some parts of normalization as [described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86700#discussion_r689086688)).
Since we discussed these recently:
- [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86700#discussion_r689158868), cc ````@matthewjasper,````
- and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57374#issuecomment-901500856), cc ````@Aaron1011.````
It should only leave [this TAIT test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-57611-trait-alias.rs) as still emitting [the terse error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-57611-trait-alias.nll.stderr).
r? ````@estebank```` (so that they shake their fist at NLL's general direction less often) or ````@nikomatsakis```` or matthew or aaron, the more the merrier.
|
|
|
|
Some of these tests have reached parity with the migrate-mode output.
|
|
|
|
Matthew's work on improving NLL's "higher-ranked subtype error"s
This PR rebases `@matthewjasper's` [branch](https://github.com/matthewjasper/rust/tree/nll-hrtb-errors) which has great work to fix the obscure higher-ranked subtype errors that are tracked in #57374.
These are a blocker to turning full NLLs on, and doing some internal cleanups to remove some of the old region code.
The goal is so `@nikomatsakis` can take a look at this early, and I'll then do my best to help do the changes and followup work to land this work, and move closer to turning off the migration mode.
I've only updated the branch and made it compile, removed a warning or two.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
(Here's the [zulip topic to discuss this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122657-t-compiler.2Fwg-nll/topic/.2357374.3A.20improving.20higher-ranked.20subtype.20errors.20via.20.2386700) that Niko wanted)
|
|
Update `polonius-engine` to 0.13.0
This PR updates the use of `polonius-engine` to the recently released 0.13.0:
- this version renamed a lot of relations to match the current terminology
- "illegal subset relationships errors" (AKA "subset errors" or "universal region errors" in rustc parlance) have been implemented in all variants, and therefore the `Hybrid` variant can be the rustc default once again
- some of the blessed expectations were updated: new tests have been added since the last time I updated the tests, diagnostics have changed, etc.
In particular:
- a few tests had trivial expectations changes such as basic diagnostics changes for the migrate-mode and full NLLs
- others were recursion and lengths limits which emits a file, and under the polonius compare-mode, the folder has a different name
- a few tests were ignored in the NLL compare-mode for reasons that obviously also apply to Polonius
- some diagnostics were unified so that older expectations no longer made sense: the NLL and Polonius outputs were identical.
- in a few cases Polonius gets a chance to emit more errors than NLLs
A few tests in the compare-mode still are super slow and trigger the 60s warning, or OOM rustc during fact generation, and I've detailed these [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/186049-t-compiler.2Fwg-polonius/topic/Challenges.20for.20move.2Finit.2C.20liveness.2C.20and.20.60Location.3A.3AAll.60):
- `src/test/ui/numbers-arithmetic/saturating-float-casts.rs` -> OOM during rustc fact generation
- `src/test/ui/numbers-arithmetic/num-wrapping.rs`
- `src/test/ui/issues/issue-72933-match-stack-overflow.rs`
- `src/test/ui/issues/issue-74564-if-expr-stack-overflow.rs`
- `src/test/ui/repr/repr-no-niche.rs`
In addition, 2 tests don't currently pass and I didn't want to bless them now: they deal with HRTBs and miss errors that NLLs emit. We're currently trying to see if we need chalk to deal with HRTB errors (as we thought we would have to) but during the recent sprint, we discovered that we may be able to detect some of these errors in a way that resembles subset errors:
- `ui/hrtb/hrtb-just-for-static.rs` -> 3 errors in NLL, 2 in polonius: a missing error about HRTB + needing to outlive 'static
- `ui/issues/issue-26217.rs` -> missing HRTB that makes the test compile instead of emitting an error
We'll keep talking about this at the next sprint as well.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-polonius` r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format
* When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline
* Color highlight modified span
|
|
Only some simple diagnostic changes happened, and rustfmt-ing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we have a cause containing `ValuePairs::PolyTraitRefs` but neither
TraitRef has any escaping bound regions then we report the same error as
for `ValuePairs::TraitRefs`.
|
|
|
|
Seeing the trait definition doesn't help with implementation not general
enough errors, so don't make the error message larger to show it.
|
|
Fixes #76267
When there is a single applicable method candidate, but its trait bounds
are not satisfied, we avoid saying that the method is "not found".
Insted, we update the error message to directly mention which bounds are
not satisfied, rather than mentioning them in a note.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a symbol name can only be imported from one place for a type, and
as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we
can trim its printed path and print only the name.
This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example,
shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other
`Vec` importable anywhere.
This adds a new '-Z trim-diagnostic-paths=false' option to control this
feature.
On the good path, with no diagnosis printed, we should try to avoid
issuing this query, so we need to prevent trimmed_def_paths query on
several cases.
This change also relies on a previous commit that differentiates
between `Debug` and `Display` on various rustc types, where the latter
is trimmed and presented to the user and the former is not.
|
|
Currently, the def span of a funtion encompasses the entire function
signature and body. However, this is usually unnecessarily verbose - when we are
pointing at an entire function in a diagnostic, we almost always want to
point at the signature. The actual contents of the body tends to be
irrelevant to the diagnostic we are emitting, and just takes up
additional screen space.
This commit changes the `def_span` of all function items (freestanding
functions, `impl`-block methods, and `trait`-block methods) to be the
span of the signature. For example, the function
```rust
pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T { val }
```
now has a `def_span` corresponding to `pub fn foo<T>(val: T) -> T`
(everything before the opening curly brace).
Trait methods without a body have a `def_span` which includes the
trailing semicolon. For example:
```rust
trait Foo {
fn bar();
}```
the function definition `Foo::bar` has a `def_span` of `fn bar();`
This makes our diagnostic output much shorter, and emphasizes
information that is relevant to whatever diagnostic we are reporting.
We continue to use the full span (including the body) in a few of
places:
* MIR building uses the full span when building source scopes.
* 'Outlives suggestions' use the full span to sort the diagnostics being
emitted.
* The `#[rustc_on_unimplemented(enclosing_scope="in this scope")]`
attribute points the entire scope body.
* The 'unconditional recursion' lint uses the full span to show
additional context for the recursive call.
All of these cases work only with local items, so we don't need to
add anything extra to crate metadata.
|
|
The bug was revealed by the behavior of the old-lub-glb-hr-noteq1.rs
test. The old-lub-glb-hr-noteq2 test shows the current 'order dependent'
behavior of coercions around higher-ranked functions, at least when
running with `-Zborrowck=mir`.
Also, run compare-mode=nll.
|
|
Motivation:
- we want to use leak-check sparingly, first off
- these calls were essentially the same as doing the check during subtyping
|
|
In particular, it no longer occurs during the subtyping check. This is
important for enabling lazy normalization, because the subtyping check
will be producing sub-obligations that could affect its results.
Consider an example like
for<'a> fn(<&'a as Mirror>::Item) =
fn(&'b u8)
where `<T as Mirror>::Item = T` for all `T`. We will wish to produce a
new subobligation like
<'!1 as Mirror>::Item = &'b u8
This will, after being solved, ultimately yield a constraint that `'!1
= 'b` which will fail. But with the leak-check being performed on
subtyping, there is no opportunity to normalize `<'!1 as
Mirror>::Item` (unless we invoke that normalization directly from
within subtyping, and I would prefer that subtyping and unification
are distinct operations rather than part of the trait solving stack).
The reason to keep the leak check during coherence and trait
evaluation is partly for backwards compatibility. The coherence change
permits impls for `fn(T)` and `fn(&T)` to co-exist, and the trait
evaluation change means that we can distinguish those two cases
without ambiguity errors. It also avoids recreating #57639, where we
were incorrectly choosing a where clause that would have failed the
leak check over the impl which succeeds.
The other reason to keep the leak check in those places is that I
think it is actually close to the model we want. To the point, I think
the trait solver ought to have the job of "breaking down"
higher-ranked region obligation like ``!1: '2` into into region
obligations that operate on things in the root universe, at which
point they should be handed off to polonius. The leak check isn't
*really* doing that -- these obligations are still handed to the
region solver to process -- but if/when we do adopt that model, the
decision to pass/fail would be happening in roughly this part of the
code.
This change had somewhat more side-effects than I anticipated. It
seems like there are cases where the leak-check was not being enforced
during method proving and trait selection. I haven't quite tracked
this down but I think it ought to be documented, so that we know what
precisely we are committing to.
One surprising test was `issue-30786.rs`. The behavior there seems a
bit "fishy" to me, but the problem is not related to the leak check
change as far as I can tell, but more to do with the closure signature
inference code and perhaps the associated type projection, which
together seem to be conspiring to produce an unexpected
signature. Nonetheless, it is an example of where changing the
leak-check can have some unexpected consequences: we're now failing to
resolve a method earlier than we were, which suggests we might change
some method resolutions that would have been ambiguous to be
successful.
TODO:
* figure out remainig test failures
* add new coherence tests for the patterns we ARE disallowing
|
|
In the new leak check, instead of getting a list of placeholders to
track, we look for any placeholder that is part of a universe which
was created during the snapshot.
We are looking for the following error patterns:
* P1: P2, where P1 != P2
* P1: R, where R is in some universe that cannot name P1
This new leak check is more precise than before, in that it accepts
this patterns:
* R: P1, even if R cannot name P1, because R = 'static is a valid
sol'n
* R: P1, R: P2, as above
Note that this leak check, when running during subtyping, is less
efficient than before in some sense because it is going to check and
re-check all the universes created since the snapshot. We're going to
move when the leak check runs to try and correct that.
|
|
This reverts commit 2e01db4b396a1e161f7a73933fff34bc9421dba0.
|
|
Also, update the affected tests. This seems strictly better but it is
actually more permissive than I initially intended. In particular it
accepts this
```
forall<'a, 'b> {
exists<'intersection> {
'a: 'intersection,
'b: 'intersection,
}
}
```
and I'm not sure I want to accept that. It implies that we have a
`'empty` in the new universe intoduced by the `forall`.
|
|
When an associated type is found when a specific type was expected, if
possible provide a structured suggestion constraining the associated
type in a bound.
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<T as Foo>::Y == i32`
--> $DIR/associated-types-multiple-types-one-trait.rs:13:5
|
LL | want_y(t);
| ^^^^^^ expected `i32`, found associated type
...
LL | fn want_y<T:Foo<Y=i32>>(t: &T) { }
| ----- required by this bound in `want_y`
|
= note: expected type `i32`
found associated type `<T as Foo>::Y`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<T as Foo>::Y` to `i32`
|
LL | fn have_x_want_y<T:Foo<X=u32, Y = i32>>(t: &T)
| ^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> $DIR/trait-with-missing-associated-type-restriction.rs:12:9
|
LL | qux(x.func())
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found associated type
|
= note: expected type `usize`
found associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A`
help: consider constraining the associated type `<impl Trait as Trait>::A` to `usize`
|
LL | fn foo(x: impl Trait<A = usize>) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^
```
|
|
extend NLL checker to understand `'empty` combined with universes
This PR extends the NLL region checker to understand `'empty` combined with universes. In particular, it means that the NLL region checker no longer considers `exists<R2> { forall<R1> { R1: R2 } }` to be provable. This is work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/59490, but we're not all the way there. One thing in particular it does not address is error messages.
The modifications to the NLL region inference code turned out to be simpler than expected. The main change is to require that if `R1: R2` then `universe(R1) <= universe(R2)`.
This constraint follows from the region lattice (shown below), because we assume then that `R2` is "at least" `empty(Universe(R2))`, and hence if `R1: R2` (i.e., `R1 >= R2` on the lattice) then `R1` must be in some universe that can name `'empty(Universe(R2))`, which requires that `Universe(R1) <= Universe(R2)`.
```
static ----------+-----...------+ (greatest)
| | |
early-bound and | |
free regions | |
| | |
scope regions | |
| | |
empty(root) placeholder(U1) |
| / |
| / placeholder(Un)
empty(U1) -- /
| /
... /
| /
empty(Un) -------- (smallest)
```
I also made what turned out to be a somewhat unrelated change to add a special region to represent `'empty(U0)`, which we use (somewhat hackily) to indicate well-formedness checks in some parts of the compiler. This fixes #68550.
I did some investigation into fixing the error message situation. That's a bit trickier: the existing "nice region error" code around placeholders relies on having better error tracing than NLL currently provides, so that it knows (e.g.) that the constraint arose from applying a trait impl and things like that. I feel like I was hoping *not* to do such fine-grained tracing in NLL, and it seems like we...largely...got away with that. I'm not sure yet if we'll have to add more tracing information or if there is some sort of alternative.
It's worth pointing out though that I've not kind of shifted my opinion on whose job it should be to enforce lifetimes: I tend to think we ought to be moving back towards *something like* the leak-check (just not the one we *had*). If we took that approach, it would actually resolve this aspect of the error message problem, because we would be resolving 'higher-ranked errors' in the trait solver itself, and hence we wouldn't have to thread as much causal information back to the region checker. I think it would also help us with removing the leak check while not breaking some of the existing crates out there.
Regardless, I think it's worth landing this change, because it was relatively simple and it aligns the set of programs that NLL accepts with those that are accepted by the main region checker, and hence should at least *help* us in migration (though I guess we still also have to resolve the existing crates that rely on leak check for coherence).
r? @matthewjasper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polonius: update to 0.12.1, fix more move errors false positives, update test expectations
This PR:
- updates `polonius-engine` to version 0.12.1 to fix some move errors false positives
- fixes a fact generation mistake creating the other move errors false positives
- updates the test expectations for the polonius compare-mode so that all (minus the 2 OOMs) ui tests pass again (matching the [analysis doc](https://hackmd.io/CjYB0fs4Q9CweyeTdKWyEg?view) starting at case 34)
In my opinion, this is safe to rollup.
r? @nikomatsakis
|
|
trivial formatting changes
|
|
Some of the bound restriction structured suggestions were incorrect
while others had subpar output.
|
|
On mismatched argument count point at arguments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plan is to use chalk and not have polonius deal with this.
|
|
|
