| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Some "this expression has a field"-related fixes
Each commit does something different and is worth reviewing, but the final diff from `master..HEAD` contains the sum of the changes to the UI tests, since some commits added UI tests "regressions" which were later removed in other commits.
The only change I could see adding on top of this is suppressing `Clone::clone` from the "this expression has a field that has this method" suggestion, since it's so commonly implemented by types that it's not worthwhile suggesting in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
|
|
Track implicit `Sized` obligations in type params
When we evaluate `ty::GenericPredicates` we introduce the implicit
`Sized` predicate of type params, but we do so with only the `Predicate`
its `Span` as context, we don't have an `Obligation` or
`ObligationCauseCode` we could influence. To try and carry this
information through, we add a new field to `ty::GenericPredicates` that
tracks both which predicates come from a type param and whether that
param has any bounds already (to use in suggestions).
We also suggest adding a `?Sized` bound if appropriate on E0599.
Address part of #98539.
|
|
Suggest adding a `?Sized` bound if appropriate on E0599 by inspecting
the HIR Generics. (Fix #98539)
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Point to type parameter definition when not finding variant, method and associated item
fixes #77391
|
|
use `def_ident_span` , `body_owner_def_id` instead of `in_progress_typeck_results`, `guess_head_span`
use `body_id.owner` directly
add description to label
|
|
Fix erroneous span for borrowck error
I am not confident that this is the correct fix, but it does the job. Open to suggestions for a real fix instead.
Fixes #97997
The issue is that we pass a [dummy location](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_middle/mir/visit.rs.html#302) when type-checking the ["required consts"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/mir/struct.Body.html#structfield.required_consts) that are needed by the MIR body during borrowck. This means that when we fail to evaluate the constant, we use the span of `bb0[0]`, instead of the actual span of the constant.
There are quite a few other places that use `START_BLOCK.start_location()`, `Location::START`, etc. when calling for a random/unspecified `Location` value. This is because, unlike (for example) `Span`, we don't have a dummy/miscellaneous value to use instead. I would appreciate guidance (either in this PR, or a follow-up) on what needs to be done to clean this up in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a typo in `test/ui/hrtb/hrtb-just-for-static.rs`
closes #97934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This attempts to bring better error messages to invalid method calls, by applying some heuristics to identify common mistakes.
The algorithm is inspired by Levenshtein distance and longest common sub-sequence. In essence, we treat the types of the function, and the types of the arguments you provided as two "words" and compute the edits to get from one to the other.
We then modify that algorithm to detect 4 cases:
- A function input is missing
- An extra argument was provided
- The type of an argument is straight up invalid
- Two arguments have been swapped
- A subset of the arguments have been shuffled
(We detect the last two as separate cases so that we can detect two swaps, instead of 4 parameters permuted.)
It helps to understand this argument by paying special attention to terminology: "inputs" refers to the inputs being *expected* by the function, and "arguments" refers to what has been provided at the call site.
The basic sketch of the algorithm is as follows:
- Construct a boolean grid, with a row for each argument, and a column for each input. The cell [i, j] is true if the i'th argument could satisfy the j'th input.
- If we find an argument that could satisfy no inputs, provided for an input that can't be satisfied by any other argument, we consider this an "invalid type".
- Extra arguments are those that can't satisfy any input, provided for an input that *could* be satisfied by another argument.
- Missing inputs are inputs that can't be satisfied by any argument, where the provided argument could satisfy another input
- Swapped / Permuted arguments are identified with a cycle detection algorithm.
As each issue is found, we remove the relevant inputs / arguments and check for more issues. If we find no issues, we match up any "valid" arguments, and start again.
Note that there's a lot of extra complexity:
- We try to stay efficient on the happy path, only computing the diagonal until we find a problem, and then filling in the rest of the matrix.
- Closure arguments are wrapped in a tuple and need to be unwrapped
- We need to resolve closure types after the rest, to allow the most specific type constraints
- We need to handle imported C functions that might be variadic in their inputs.
I tried to document a lot of this in comments in the code and keep the naming clear.
|
|
Add known-bug for #95034
Couldn't fix the issue, since I am no type theorist and inference variables in universes above U0 scare me. But I at least wanted to add a known-bug test for it.
cc #95034 (does not fix)
|
|
|
|
Instead of probing for all possible impls that could have caused an
`ImplObligation`, keep track of its `DefId` and obligation spans for
accurate error reporting.
Follow up to #89580. Addresses #89418.
Remove some unnecessary clones.
Tweak output for auto trait impl obligations.
|
|
* Point at RHS of associated type in obligation span
* Point at `impl` assoc type on projection error
* Reduce verbosity of recursive obligations
* Point at source of binding lifetime obligation
* Tweak "required bound" note
* Tweak "expected... found opaque (return) type" labels
* Point at set type in impl assoc type WF errors
|
|
|
|
Group obligations by `impl` block that introduced them.
|
|
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
Address part of #89418.
|
|
|
|
Fixes #90101
|
|
Fixes #73159
This is similar to #69350 - if the user didn't initially
write out a 'static lifetime, adding 'static in response to
a lifetime error is usually the wrong thing to do.
|
|
Currently, we use a relatively 'small' span for THIR
expressions generated by an 'adjustment' (e.g. an autoderef,
autoborrow, unsizing). As a result, if a borrow generated
by an adustment ends up causing a borrowcheck error, for example:
```rust
let mut my_var = String::new();
let my_ref = &my_var
my_var.push('a');
my_ref;
```
then the span for the mutable borrow may end up referring
to only the base expression (e.g. `my_var`), rather than
the method call which triggered the mutable borrow
(e.g. `my_var.push('a')`)
Due to a quirk of the MIR borrowck implementation,
this doesn't always get exposed in migration mode,
but it does in many cases.
This commit makes THIR building consistently use 'larger'
spans for adjustment expressions
The intent of this change it make it clearer to users
when it's the specific way in which a variable is
used (for example, in a method call) that produdes
a borrowcheck error. For example, an error message
claiming that a 'mutable borrow occurs here' might
be confusing if it just points at a usage of a variable
(e.g. `my_var`), when no `&mut` is in sight. Pointing
at the entire expression should help to emphasize
that the method call itself is responsible for
the mutable borrow.
In several cases, this makes the `#![feature(nll)]` diagnostic
output match up exactly with the default (migration mode) output.
As a result, several `.nll.stderr` files end up getting removed
entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Handle type ascription type ops in NLL HRTB diagnostics
Currently, there are still a few cases of the "higher-ranked subtype error" of yore, 4 of which are related to type ascription.
This PR is a follow-up to #86700, adding support for type ascription type ops, and makes 3 of these tests output the same diagnostics in NLL mode as the migrate mode (and 1 is now much closer, especially if you ignore that it already outputs an additional error in NLL mode -- which could be a duplicate caused by a lack of normalization like [these comments point out](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/compiler/rustc_traits/src/type_op.rs#L122-L157), or an imprecision in some parts of normalization as [described here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86700#discussion_r689086688)).
Since we discussed these recently:
- [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86700#discussion_r689158868), cc ````@matthewjasper,````
- and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57374#issuecomment-901500856), cc ````@Aaron1011.````
It should only leave [this TAIT test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-57611-trait-alias.rs) as still emitting [the terse error](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/9583fd1bdd0127328e25e5b8c24dff575ec2c86b/src/test/ui/type-alias-impl-trait/issue-57611-trait-alias.nll.stderr).
r? ````@estebank```` (so that they shake their fist at NLL's general direction less often) or ````@nikomatsakis```` or matthew or aaron, the more the merrier.
|
|
|
|
Some of these tests have reached parity with the migrate-mode output.
|
|
|
|
Matthew's work on improving NLL's "higher-ranked subtype error"s
This PR rebases `@matthewjasper's` [branch](https://github.com/matthewjasper/rust/tree/nll-hrtb-errors) which has great work to fix the obscure higher-ranked subtype errors that are tracked in #57374.
These are a blocker to turning full NLLs on, and doing some internal cleanups to remove some of the old region code.
The goal is so `@nikomatsakis` can take a look at this early, and I'll then do my best to help do the changes and followup work to land this work, and move closer to turning off the migration mode.
I've only updated the branch and made it compile, removed a warning or two.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
(Here's the [zulip topic to discuss this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122657-t-compiler.2Fwg-nll/topic/.2357374.3A.20improving.20higher-ranked.20subtype.20errors.20via.20.2386700) that Niko wanted)
|
|
Update `polonius-engine` to 0.13.0
This PR updates the use of `polonius-engine` to the recently released 0.13.0:
- this version renamed a lot of relations to match the current terminology
- "illegal subset relationships errors" (AKA "subset errors" or "universal region errors" in rustc parlance) have been implemented in all variants, and therefore the `Hybrid` variant can be the rustc default once again
- some of the blessed expectations were updated: new tests have been added since the last time I updated the tests, diagnostics have changed, etc.
In particular:
- a few tests had trivial expectations changes such as basic diagnostics changes for the migrate-mode and full NLLs
- others were recursion and lengths limits which emits a file, and under the polonius compare-mode, the folder has a different name
- a few tests were ignored in the NLL compare-mode for reasons that obviously also apply to Polonius
- some diagnostics were unified so that older expectations no longer made sense: the NLL and Polonius outputs were identical.
- in a few cases Polonius gets a chance to emit more errors than NLLs
A few tests in the compare-mode still are super slow and trigger the 60s warning, or OOM rustc during fact generation, and I've detailed these [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/186049-t-compiler.2Fwg-polonius/topic/Challenges.20for.20move.2Finit.2C.20liveness.2C.20and.20.60Location.3A.3AAll.60):
- `src/test/ui/numbers-arithmetic/saturating-float-casts.rs` -> OOM during rustc fact generation
- `src/test/ui/numbers-arithmetic/num-wrapping.rs`
- `src/test/ui/issues/issue-72933-match-stack-overflow.rs`
- `src/test/ui/issues/issue-74564-if-expr-stack-overflow.rs`
- `src/test/ui/repr/repr-no-niche.rs`
In addition, 2 tests don't currently pass and I didn't want to bless them now: they deal with HRTBs and miss errors that NLLs emit. We're currently trying to see if we need chalk to deal with HRTB errors (as we thought we would have to) but during the recent sprint, we discovered that we may be able to detect some of these errors in a way that resembles subset errors:
- `ui/hrtb/hrtb-just-for-static.rs` -> 3 errors in NLL, 2 in polonius: a missing error about HRTB + needing to outlive 'static
- `ui/issues/issue-26217.rs` -> missing HRTB that makes the test compile instead of emitting an error
We'll keep talking about this at the next sprint as well.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-polonius` r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format
* When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline
* Color highlight modified span
|
|
Only some simple diagnostic changes happened, and rustfmt-ing.
|
|
|
