| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
When missing a comma in a macro call, suggest it, regardless of
position. When a macro call doesn't match any of the patterns, check
if the call's token stream could be missing a comma between two idents,
and if so, create a new token stream containing the comma and try to
match against the macro patterns. If successful, emit the suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Point spans to inner elements of format strings
- Point at missing positional specifiers in string literal
```
error: invalid reference to positional arguments 3, 4 and 5 (there are 3 arguments)
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:34:38
|
LL | format!("{name} {value} {} {} {} {} {} {}", 0, name=1, value=2);
| ^^ ^^ ^^
|
= note: positional arguments are zero-based
```
- Point at named formatting specifier in string literal
```
error: there is no argument named `foo`
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:37:17
|
LL | format!("{} {foo} {} {bar} {}", 1, 2, 3);
| ^^^^^
```
- Update label for formatting string in "multiple unused formatting arguments" to be more correct
```
error: multiple unused formatting arguments
--> $DIR/ifmt-bad-arg.rs:42:17
|
LL | format!("", 1, 2); //~ ERROR: multiple unused formatting arguments
| -- ^ ^
| |
| multiple missing formatting specifiers
```
- When using `printf` string formatting, provide a structured suggestion instead of a note
```
error: multiple unused formatting arguments
--> $DIR/format-foreign.rs:12:30
|
LL | println!("%.*3$s %s!/n", "Hello,", "World", 4); //~ ERROR multiple unused formatting arguments
| -------------- ^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^
| |
| multiple missing formatting specifiers
|
= note: printf formatting not supported; see the documentation for `std::fmt`
help: format specifiers in Rust are written using `{}`
|
LL | println!("{:.2$} {}!/n", "Hello,", "World", 4); //~ ERROR multiple unused formatting arguments
| ^^^^^^ ^^
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve suggestion for missing fmt str in println
Avoid using `concat!(fmt, "\n")` to improve the diagnostics being
emitted when the first `println!()` argument isn't a formatting string
literal.
Fix #52347.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Don't print the newline on its own to avoid the possibility of
printing it out of order due to `stdout` locking.
- Modify wording of `concat!()` with non-literals to not mislead into
believing that only `&str` literals are accepted.
- Add test for `concat!()` with non-literals.
|
|
Avoid using `concat!(fmt, "\n")` to improve the diagnostics being
emitted when the first `println!()` argument isn't a formatting string
literal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit d6ba1b9b021c408fcad60ee52acf8af5e1b2eb00, reversing
changes made to 8de5353f75dcde04abe947e0560dc5edd861cf3a.
|
|
Following up to #49896 and #50629. Fixes #32110.
E0689 is weird.
|
|
|
|
Affected methods are `abs`, `signum`, and `powi`.
CC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32110#issuecomment-379503183
|
|
Update `?` repetition disambiguation.
**Do not merge** (yet)
This is a test implementation of some ideas from discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48075 . This PR
- disallows `?` repetition from taking a separator, since the separator is never used.
- disallows the use of `?` as a separator. This allows patterns like `$(a)?+` to match `+` and `a+` rather than `a?a?a`. This is a _breaking change_, but maybe that's ok? Perhaps a crater run is the right approach?
cc @durka @alexreg @nikomatsakis
|
|
macros: Remove matching on "complex" nonterminals requiring AST comparisons
So, you can actually use nonterminals from outer macros in left hand side of nested macros and invocations of nested macros will try to match passed arguments to them.
```rust
macro outer($nt_item: item) {
macro inner($nt_item) {
struct S;
}
inner!($nt_item); // OK, `$nt_item` matches `$nt_item`
}
```
Why this is bad:
- We can't do this matching correctly. When two nonterminals are compared, the original tokens are lost and we have to compare AST fragments instead. Right now the comparison is done by `PartialEq` impls derived on AST structures.
- On one hand, AST loses information compared to original tokens (e.g. trailing separators and other simplifications done during parsing to AST), so we can produce matches that are not actually correct.
- On another hand derived `PartialEq` impls for AST structures don't make much sense in general and compare various auxiliary garbage like spans. For the argument nonterminal to match we should use literally the same token (possibly cloned) as was used in the macro LHS (as in the example above). So we can reject matches that are actually correct.
- Support for nonterminal matching is the only thing that forces us to derive `PartialEq` for all (!) AST structures. As I mentioned these impls are also mostly nonsensical.
This PR removes support for matching on all nonterminals except for "simple" ones like `ident`, `lifetime` and `tt` for which we have original tokens that can be compared.
After this is done I'll submit another PR removing huge number of `PartialEq` impls from AST and HIR structures.
This is an arcane feature and I don't personally know why would anyone use it, but the change should ideally go through crater.
We'll be able to support this feature again in the future when all nonterminals have original token streams attached to them in addition to (or instead of) AST fragments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rustc explain
Fixes #48041.
To make the review easier, I separated tests update to code update. Also, I used this script to generate new ui tests stderr:
```python
from os import listdir
from os.path import isdir, isfile, join
PATH = "src/test/ui"
def do_something(path):
files = [join(path, f) for f in listdir(path)]
for f in files:
if isdir(f):
do_something(f)
continue
if not isfile(f) or not f.endswith(".stderr"):
continue
x = open(f, "r")
content = x.read().strip()
if "error[E" not in content:
continue
errors = dict()
for y in content.splitlines():
if y.startswith("error[E"):
errors[y[6:11]] = True
errors = sorted(errors.keys())
if len(errors) < 1:
print("weird... {}".format(f))
continue
if len(errors) > 1:
content += "\n\nYou've got a few errors: {}".format(", ".join(errors))
content += "\nIf you want more information on an error, try using \"rustc --explain {}\"".format(errors[0])
else:
content += "\n\nIf you want more information on this error, try using \"rustc --explain {}\"".format(errors[0])
content += "\n"
x = open(f, "w")
x.write(content)
do_something(PATH)
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the parser attempts to synthesize spans from within a macro
context with the span for the captured argument, leading to non-sensical
spans with very bad output. Given that an incorrect span is worse than
a partially incomplete span, when detecting this situation return only
one of the spans without mergin them.
|
|
Point at unused arguments for format string
Avoid overlapping spans by only pointing at the arguments that are not
being used in the argument string. Enable libsyntax to have diagnostics
with multiple primary spans by accepting `Into<MultiSpan>` instead of
`Span`.
Partially addresses #41850.
|
|
|
|
Avoid overlapping spans by only pointing at the arguments that are not
being used in the argument string. Enable libsyntax to have diagnostics
with multiple primary spans by accepting `Into<MultiSpan>` instead of
`Span`.
|
|
When we suggest the replacement for a macro we include the "!" in the
suggested replacement but the span only contains the name of the macro
itself. Using that replacement would cause a duplicate "!" in the
resulting code.
I originally tried to extend the span to be replaced by 1 byte in
rust-lang/rust#47424. However, @zackmdavis pointed out that there can be
whitespace between the macro name and the bang.
Instead, just remove the bang from the suggested replacement.
Fixes #47418
|
|
|
|
|
