| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Note maximum integer literal for `IntLiteralTooLarge`
Closes #105908
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
|
|
Also update tests
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Rename `Rptr` to `Ref` in AST and HIR
The name makes a lot more sense, and `ty::TyKind` calls it `Ref` already as well.
|
|
Properly calculate best failure in macro matching
Previously, we used spans. This was not good. Sometimes, the span of the token that failed to match may come from a position later in the file which has been transcribed into a token stream way earlier in the file. If precisely this token fails to match, we think that it was the best match because its span is so high, even though other arms might have gotten further in the token stream.
We now try to properly use the location in the token stream.
This needs a little cleanup as the `best_failure` field is getting out of hand but it should be mostly good to go. I hope I didn't violate too many abstraction boundaries..
|
|
The name makes a lot more sense, and `ty::TyKind` calls it `Ref` already
as well.
|
|
|
|
available
|
|
Previously, we used spans. This was not good. Sometimes, the span of the
token that failed to match may come from a position later in the file
which has been transcribed into a token stream way earlier in the file.
If precisely this token fails to match, we think that it was the best
match because its span is so high, even though other arms might have
gotten further in the token stream.
We now try to properly use the location in the token stream.
|
|
|
|
This migrates everything but the `mbe` and `proc_macro` modules. It also
contains a few cleanups and drive-by/accidental diagnostic improvements
which can be seen in the diff for the UI tests.
|
|
propagate the error from parsing enum variant to the parser and emit out
While parsing enum variant, the error message always disappear
Because the error message that emit out is from main error of parser
The information of enum variant disappears while parsing enum variant with error
We only check the syntax of expecting token, i.e, in case https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103869
It will error it without telling the message that this error is from pasring enum variant.
Propagate the sub-error from parsing enum variant to the main error of parser by chaining it with map_err
Check the sub-error before emitting the main error of parser and attach it.
Fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103869
|
|
Fix ICE on parsing an invalid variable declaration as a statement like:
```
macro_rules! m { ($s:stmt) => {} }
m! { var x }
```
|
|
Because the error message that emit out is from main error of parser
The information of enum variant disappears while parsing enum variant with error
We only check the syntax of expecting token, i.e, in case #103869
It will error it without telling the message that this error is from pasring enum variant.
Propagate the sub-error from parsing enum variant to the main error of parser by chaining it with map_err
Check the sub-error before emitting the main error of parser and attach it.
Fix #103869
|
|
Fix `expr_to_spanned_string` ICE
Fixes #105011
|
|
|
|
Fixes #104769.
|
|
Record `LocalDefId` in HIR nodes instead of a side table
This is part of an attempt to remove the `HirId -> LocalDefId` table from HIR.
This attempt is a prerequisite to creation of `LocalDefId` after HIR lowering (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96840), by controlling how `def_id` information is accessed.
This first part adds the information to HIR nodes themselves instead of a table.
The second part is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103902
The third part will be to make `hir::Visitor::visit_fn` take a `LocalDefId` as last parameter.
The fourth part will be to completely remove the side table.
|
|
This prevents issues with eager parser recovery during macro matching.
|
|
This shows a small note on what the macro matcher was currently
processing to aid with "no rules expected the token X" errors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fee1-dead-contrib:stabilize_arbitrary_enum_discriminant, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize arbitrary_enum_discriminant, take 2
Documentation has been updated in https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1055. cc #86860 for previous stabilization report.
Not yet marks https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553 as done: need documentation in the rust reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix ICE #102878
Fixes #102878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
danielhenrymantilla:no-bounds-for-default-annotated-derive, r=joshtriplett
Fix `#[derive(Default)]` on a generic `#[default]` enum adding unnecessary `Default` bounds
That is, given something like:
```rs
// #[default] on a generic enum does not add `Default` bounds to the type params.
#[derive(Default)]
enum MyOption<T> {
#[default]
None,
Some(T),
}
```
then `MyOption<T> : Default`_as currently implemented_ only holds when `T : Default`, as reported by ```@5225225``` [over Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/.23.5Bderive.28Default.29.5D.20for.20enums.20with.20fields).
This is contrary to [what the accepted RFC proposes](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3107-derive-default-enum.html#generated-bounds) (_i.e._, that `T` be allowed not to be itself `Default`), and indeed seems to be a rather unnecessary limitation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test case actually requires std::process.
|
|
Adding needs-unwind to nicer-assert-messages compiler ui tests
Tests where unwind is required for asserting on contents of error message
cc. ``@djkoloski``
r? ``@tmandry``
|
|
|
|
Co-Authored-By: Mark Rousskov <mark.simulacrum@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Stabilization proposal
The feature was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50045 by est31 and has been in nightly since 2018-05-16 (over 4 years now).
There are [no open issues][issue-label] other than the tracking issue. There is a strong consensus that `break` is the right keyword and we should not use `return`.
There have been several concerns raised about this feature on the tracking issue (other than the one about tests, which has been fixed, and an interaction with try blocks, which has been fixed).
1. nrc's original comment about cost-benefit analysis: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422235234
2. joshtriplett's comments about seeing use cases: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422281176
3. withoutboats's comments that Rust does not need more control flow constructs: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450050630
Many different examples of code that's simpler using this feature have been provided:
- A lexer by rpjohnst which must repeat code without label-break-value: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-422502014
- A snippet by SergioBenitez which avoids using a new function and adding several new return points to a function: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-427628251. This particular case would also work if `try` blocks were stabilized (at the cost of making the code harder to optimize).
- Several examples by JohnBSmith: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-434651395
- Several examples by Centril: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-440154733
- An example by petrochenkov where this is used in the compiler itself to avoid duplicating error checking code: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-443557569
- Amanieu recently provided another example related to complex conditions, where try blocks would not have helped: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1184213006
Additionally, petrochenkov notes that this is strictly more powerful than labelled loops due to macros which accidentally exit a loop instead of being consumed by the macro matchers: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-450246249
nrc later resolved their concern, mostly because of the aforementioned macro problems.
joshtriplett suggested that macros could be able to generate IR directly
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-451685983) but there are no open RFCs,
and the design space seems rather speculative.
joshtriplett later resolved his concerns, due to a symmetry between this feature and existing labelled break: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-632960804
withoutboats has regrettably left the language team.
joshtriplett later posted that the lang team would consider starting an FCP given a stabilization report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48594#issuecomment-1111269353
[issue-label]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AF-label_break_value+
## Report
+ Feature gate:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d695a497bbf4b20d2580b75075faa80230d41667/src/test/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-label_break_value.rs
+ Diagnostics:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/6b2d3d5f3cd1e553d87b5496632132565b6779d3/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs#L2629
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/f65bf0b2bb1a99f73095c01a118f3c37d3ee614c/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs#L749
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/f65bf0b2bb1a99f73095c01a118f3c37d3ee614c/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/diagnostics.rs#L1001
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/111df9e6eda1d752233482c1309d00d20a4bbf98/compiler/rustc_passes/src/loops.rs#L254
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d695a497bbf4b20d2580b75075faa80230d41667/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs#L2079
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d695a497bbf4b20d2580b75075faa80230d41667/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs#L1569
+ Tests:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_continue.rs
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_unlabeled_break.rs
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/label/label_break_value_illegal_uses.rs
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/lint/unused_labels.rs
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/run-pass/for-loop-while/label_break_value.rs
## Interactions with other features
Labels follow the hygiene of local variables.
label-break-value is permitted within `try` blocks:
```rust
let _: Result<(), ()> = try {
'foo: {
Err(())?;
break 'foo;
}
};
```
label-break-value is disallowed within closures, generators, and async blocks:
```rust
'a: {
|| break 'a
//~^ ERROR use of unreachable label `'a`
//~| ERROR `break` inside of a closure
}
```
label-break-value is disallowed on [_BlockExpression_]; it can only occur as a [_LoopExpression_]:
```rust
fn labeled_match() {
match false 'b: { //~ ERROR block label not supported here
_ => {}
}
}
macro_rules! m {
($b:block) => {
'lab: $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
unsafe $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
|x: u8| -> () $b; //~ ERROR cannot use a `block` macro fragment here
}
}
fn foo() {
m!({});
}
```
[_BlockExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/block-expr.html
[_LoopExpression_]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/expressions/loop-expr.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't ICE while suggesting updating item path.
When an item isn't found, we may suggest an appropriate import to `use`. Along with that, we also suggest updating the path to work with the `use`. Unfortunately, if the code in question originates from a macro, the span used to indicate which part of the path needs updating may not be suitable and cause an ICE (*). Since, such code is not adjustable directly by the user without modifying the macro, just skip the suggestion in such cases.
(*) The ICE happens because the emitter want to indicate to the user what code to delete by referencing a certain span. But in this case, said span has `lo == hi == 0` which means it thinks it's a dummy span. Adding a space before the proc macro attribute is enough to stop it from ICE'ing but even then the suggestion doesn't really make any sense:
```
help: if you import `DataStore`, refer to it directly
|
1 - #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
1 + #[dbstruct::dbstruct]
```
Since suggestions are best-effort, I just gated this one on `can_be_used_for_suggestions` which catches cases like this.
Fixes #100199
|
|
|
|
|
