| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently, we only point at the span of the macro argument. When the
macro call is itself generated by another macro, this can make it
difficult or impossible to determine which macro is responsible for
producing the error.
|
|
As described in issue #85708, we currently do not properly decode
`SyntaxContext::root()` and `ExpnId::root()` from foreign crates. As a
result, when we decode a span from a foreign crate with
`SyntaxContext::root()`, we end up up considering it to have the edition
of the *current* crate, instead of the foreign crate where it was
originally created.
A full fix for this issue will be a fairly significant undertaking.
Fortunately, it's possible to implement a partial fix, which gives us
the correct edition-dependent behavior for `:pat` matchers when the
macro is loaded from another crate. Since we have the edition of the
macro's defining crate available, we can 'recover' from seeing a
`SyntaxContext::root()` and use the edition of the macro's defining
crate.
Any solution to issue #85708 must reproduce the behavior of this
targeted fix - properly preserving a foreign `SyntaxContext::root()`
means (among other things) preserving its edition, which by definition
is the edition of the foreign crate itself. Therefore, this fix moves us
closer to the correct overall solution, and does not expose any new
incorrect behavior to macros.
|
|
In addition to making the output look nicer for all crates, this also
aligns the pretty-printing output with what the `rental` crate expects.
This will allow us to eventually disable a backwards-compat hack in a
follow-up PR.
|
|
On x86, the default syntax is also switched to Intel to match asm!
|
|
When there are multiple macros in use, it can be difficult to tell
which one was responsible for producing an error.
|
|
The spans generated by `quote!` are (intentionally) no longer all the
same, so I removed that check entirely.
|
|
Stabilize `:pat_param` and remove `:pat2021`
Blocked on #83384
cc `@rust-lang/lang` #79278
If I understand `@nikomatsakis` in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/or.20patterns/near/231133873, another FCP is not needed.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit e2561c58a41023a14e0e583113dcf55e1ecb236a, reversing
changes made to 2982ba50fc4bb629b8fe4108a81cb2f9b053510b.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #84195
|
|
add more pat2021 tests
close https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84138
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While derives were being collected in left-to-order order, the
corresponding `Invocation`s were being pushed in the wrong order.
|
|
expand: Do not ICE when a legacy AST-based macro attribute produces and empty expression
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80251
The reported error is the same as for `let _ = #[cfg(FALSE)] EXPR;`
|
|
This is step 2 towards fixing #77548.
In the codegen and codegen-units test suites, the `//` comment markers
were kept in order not to affect any source locations. This is because
these tests cannot be automatically `--bless`ed.
|
|
empty expression
|
|
|
|
test: add more cases
test: add comments
refine msg
|
|
format macro argument parsing fix
When the character next to `{}` is "shifted" (when mapping a byte index
in the format string to span) we should avoid shifting the span end
index, so first map the index of `}` to span, then bump the span,
instead of first mapping the next byte index to a span (which causes
bumping the end span too much).
Regression test added.
Fixes #83344
---
r? ```@estebank```
|
|
When the character next to `{}` is "shifted" (when mapping a byte index
in the format string to span) we should avoid shifting the span end
index, so first map the index of `}` to span, then bump the span,
instead of first mapping the next byte index to a span (which causes
bumping the end span too much).
Regression test added.
Fixes #83344
|
|
Simplify and fix byte skipping in format! string parser
Fixes '\\' handling in format strings.
Fixes #83340
|
|
rename :pat2018 -> :pat2015
as requested by T-lang on zulip: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/or.20patterns/near/231133873
No functional changes here... just renaming.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Stabilize or_patterns (RFC 2535, 2530, 2175)
closes #54883
This PR stabilizes the or_patterns feature in Rust 1.53.
This is blocked on the following (in order):
- [x] The crater run in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78935#issuecomment-731564021
- [x] The resolution of the unresolved questions and a second crater run (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78935#issuecomment-735412705)
- It looks like we will need to pursue some sort of edition-based transition for `:pat`.
- [x] Nomination and discussion by T-lang
- [x] Implement new behavior for `:pat` based on consensus (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80100).
- [ ] An FCP on stabilization
EDIT: Stabilization report is in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79278#issuecomment-772815177
|
|
|
|
Fixes '\\' handling in format strings.
Fixes #83340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support `pub` on `macro_rules`
This rebases and updates `since` version of #78166 from ``@petrochenkov``
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
|
|
Some newcomers are confused by the behavior of tail expressions,
interpreting that "leaving out the `;` makes it the return value".
To help them go in the right direction, suggest using `return` instead
when applicable.
|
|
|
|
Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 4
cc #81941
|
|
|
|
|
|
It can be useful to do some computation in `assert!` format arguments, in order to get better error messages. For example:
```rust
assert!(
some_condition,
"The state is invalid. Details: {}",
expensive_call_to_get_debugging_info(),
);
```
It seems like `assert!` only evaluates the format arguments if the assertion fails, which is useful but doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. This PR documents the behavior and adds some tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This extends the `panic_fmt` lint to warn for all cases where the first
argument cannot be interpreted as a format string, as will happen in
Rust 2021.
It suggests to add `"{}", ` to format the message as a string. In the
case of `std::panic!()`, it also suggests the recently stabilized
`std::panic::panic_any()` function as an alternative.
It renames the lint to `non_fmt_panic` to match the lint naming
guidelines.
|
|
|
|
rustc_parse_format: Fix character indices in find_skips
Fixes #81006
|
|
Fixes #81006
|
|
|
|
Address comments
Update limits
|
|
|
