| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Suggest calling the instance method of the same name when method not found
Fixes #103474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggest adding a `?Sized` bound if appropriate on E0599 by inspecting
the HIR Generics. (Fix #98539)
|
|
use `def_ident_span` , `body_owner_def_id` instead of `in_progress_typeck_results`, `guess_head_span`
use `body_id.owner` directly
add description to label
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use revisions instead of nll compare mode for `/self/` ui tests
r? ``@jackh726``
|
|
|
|
This attempts to bring better error messages to invalid method calls, by applying some heuristics to identify common mistakes.
The algorithm is inspired by Levenshtein distance and longest common sub-sequence. In essence, we treat the types of the function, and the types of the arguments you provided as two "words" and compute the edits to get from one to the other.
We then modify that algorithm to detect 4 cases:
- A function input is missing
- An extra argument was provided
- The type of an argument is straight up invalid
- Two arguments have been swapped
- A subset of the arguments have been shuffled
(We detect the last two as separate cases so that we can detect two swaps, instead of 4 parameters permuted.)
It helps to understand this argument by paying special attention to terminology: "inputs" refers to the inputs being *expected* by the function, and "arguments" refers to what has been provided at the call site.
The basic sketch of the algorithm is as follows:
- Construct a boolean grid, with a row for each argument, and a column for each input. The cell [i, j] is true if the i'th argument could satisfy the j'th input.
- If we find an argument that could satisfy no inputs, provided for an input that can't be satisfied by any other argument, we consider this an "invalid type".
- Extra arguments are those that can't satisfy any input, provided for an input that *could* be satisfied by another argument.
- Missing inputs are inputs that can't be satisfied by any argument, where the provided argument could satisfy another input
- Swapped / Permuted arguments are identified with a cycle detection algorithm.
As each issue is found, we remove the relevant inputs / arguments and check for more issues. If we find no issues, we match up any "valid" arguments, and start again.
Note that there's a lot of extra complexity:
- We try to stay efficient on the happy path, only computing the diagonal until we find a problem, and then filling in the rest of the matrix.
- Closure arguments are wrapped in a tuple and need to be unwrapped
- We need to resolve closure types after the rest, to allow the most specific type constraints
- We need to handle imported C functions that might be variadic in their inputs.
I tried to document a lot of this in comments in the code and keep the naming clear.
|
|
This reverts commit 6499c5e7fc173a3f55b7a3bd1e6a50e9edef782d, reversing
changes made to 78450d2d602b06d9b94349aaf8cece1a4acaf3a8.
|
|
|
|
match up for traits and impls.
Issue #94462
|
|
This reverts commit 3cfa4def7c87d571bd46d92fed608edf8fad236e, reversing
changes made to 5d8767cb229b097fedb1dd4bd9420d463c37774f.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit e7cc3bddbe0d0e374d05e7003e662bba1742dbae, reversing
changes made to 734368a200904ef9c21db86c595dc04263c87be0.
|
|
Previously we did this per hidden type candiate, which didn't always have all the information available.
|
|
by using an opaque type obligation to bubble up comparisons between opaque types and other types
Also uses proper obligation causes so that the body id works, because out of some reason nll uses body ids for logic instead of just diagnostics.
|
|
improve `_` constants in item signature handling
removing the "type" from the error messages does slightly worsen the error messages for types, but figuring out whether the placeholder is for a type or a constant and correctly dealing with that seemed fairly difficult to me so I took the easy way out :sparkles: Imo the error message is still clear enough.
r? `@BoxyUwU` cc `@estebank`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lifetime name shoud always appear in text surrounded by `.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not suggest importing inaccessible items
Fixes #88472. For this example:
```rust
mod a {
struct Foo;
}
mod b {
type Bar = Foo;
}
```
rustc currently emits:
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `Foo` in this scope
--> test.rs:6:16
|
6 | type Bar = Foo;
| ^^^ not found in this scope
|
help: consider importing this struct
|
6 | use a::Foo;
|
```
this is incorrect, as applying this suggestion leads to
```
error[E0603]: struct `Foo` is private
--> test.rs:6:12
|
6 | use a::Foo;
| ^^^ private struct
|
note: the struct `Foo` is defined here
--> test.rs:2:5
|
2 | struct Foo;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^
```
With my changes, I get:
```
error[E0412]: cannot find type `Foo` in this scope
--> test.rs:6:16
|
6 | type Bar = Foo;
| ^^^ not found in this scope
|
= note: this struct exists but is inaccessible:
a::Foo
```
As for the wildcard mentioned in #88472, I would argue that the warning is actually correct, since the import _is_ unused. I think the real issue is the wrong suggestion, which I have fixed here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* On suggestions that include deletions, use a diff inspired output format
* When suggesting addition, use `+` as underline
* Color highlight modified span
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make it more clear what an about async fn's returns when referring to what it returns
see #76547
This is *likely* not the ONLY place that this happens to be unclear, but we can move this fn to rustc_middle or something like that and reuse it if need be, to apply it to more diagnostics
One outstanding question I have is, if the fn returns (), should I make the message more clear (what about `fn f()` vs `fn f() -> ()`, can you tell those apart in the hir?)
R? `@tmandry`
`@rustbot` modify labels +A-diagnostics +T-compiler
|
|
|
|
Fix #77598.
|
|
|
|
|
