about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/ui/methods/call_method_unknown_referent.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-08-07Use `tcx.short_string()` in more diagnosticsEsteban Küber-1/+1
`TyCtxt::short_string` ensures that user visible type paths aren't overwhelming on the terminal output, and properly saves the long name to disk as a side-channel. We already use these throughout the compiler and have been using them as needed when users find cases where the output is verbose. This is a proactive search of some cases to use `short_string`. We add support for shortening the path of "trait path only". Every manual use of `short_string` is a bright marker that that error should be using structured diagnostics instead (as they have proper handling of long types without the maintainer having to think abou tthem). When we don't actually print out a shortened type we don't need the "use `--verbose`" note. On E0599 show type identity to avoid expanding the receiver's generic parameters. Unify wording on `long_ty_path` everywhere.
2024-12-11Arbitrary self types v2: use Receiver traitAdrian Taylor-0/+48
In this new version of Arbitrary Self Types, we no longer use the Deref trait exclusively when working out which self types are valid. Instead, we follow a chain of Receiver traits. This enables methods to be called on smart pointer types which fundamentally cannot support Deref (for instance because they are wrappers for pointers that don't follow Rust's aliasing rules). This includes: * Changes to tests appropriately * New tests for: * The basics of the feature * Ensuring lifetime elision works properly * Generic Receivers * A copy of the method subst test enhanced with Receiver This is really the heart of the 'arbitrary self types v2' feature, and is the most critical commit in the current PR. Subsequent commits are focused on: * Detecting "shadowing" problems, where a smart pointer type can hide methods in the pointee. * Diagnostics and cleanup. Naming: in this commit, the "Autoderef" type is modified so that it no longer solely focuses on the "Deref" trait, but can now consider the "Receiver" trait instead. Should it be renamed, to something like "TraitFollower"? This was considered, but rejected, because * even in the Receiver case, it still considers built-in derefs * the name Autoderef is short and snappy.