| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
This handles various kinds of errors, but does not allow applying the
derive yet.
This adds the feature gate `macro_derive`.
|
|
|
|
This handles various kinds of errors, but does not allow applying the
attributes yet.
This adds the feature gate `macro_attr`.
|
|
Most macro tests use `macro` in the name, making it easy to find and run
tests relevant to macros. However, a few use `mbe` instead. Rename those
to say `macro`.
|
|
The `macro` directory contains most of the macro tests, but not all of
them; move the remainder into `macro`.
|
|
Add a test for various cases of invalid macro definitions.
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143351
|
|
Since [1], the fragment specifier is unconditionally required in all
editions. This means `NonTerminalKind` no longer needs to be optional,
as we can reject this code during the expansion of `macro_rules!` rather
than handling it throughout the code. Do this cleanup here.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128425
|
|
This was attempted in [1] then reverted in [2] because of fallout.
Recently, this was made an edition-dependent error in [3].
Make missing fragment specifiers an unconditional error again.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75516
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80210
[3]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128006
|
|
- The lint is now reported in code that gets removed/modified/duplicated
by macro expansion.
- Spans are more accurate
- Fixes #140281
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes about tests:
- tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2294-if-let-guard/feature-gate.rs: some messages are
now duplicated due to repeated parsing.
- tests/ui/rfcs/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/disallowed-positions.rs: ditto.
- `tests/ui/proc-macro/macro-rules-derive-cfg.rs`: the diff looks large
but the only difference is the insertion of a single
invisible-delimited group around a metavar.
- `tests/ui/attributes/nonterminal-expansion.rs`: a slight span
degradation, somehow related to the recent massive attr parsing
rewrite (#135726). I couldn't work out exactly what is going wrong,
but I don't think it's worth holding things up for a single slightly
suboptimal error message.
|
|
Fix "missing match arm body" suggestion involving `!`
Include the match arm guard in the gated span, so that the suggestion to add a body is correct instead of inserting the body before the guard.
Make the suggestion verbose.
```
error: `match` arm with no body
--> $DIR/feature-gate-never_patterns.rs:43:9
|
LL | Some(_) if false,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: add a body after the pattern
|
LL | Some(_) if false => { todo!() },
| ++++++++++++++
```
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Include the match arm guard in the gated span, so that the suggestion to add a body is correct instead of inserting the body before the guard.
Make the suggestion verbose.
```
error: `match` arm with no body
--> $DIR/feature-gate-never_patterns.rs:43:9
|
LL | Some(_) if false,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: add a body after the pattern
|
LL | Some(_) if false => { todo!() },
| ++++++++++++++
```
|
|
Notes about tests:
- tests/ui/parser/macro/trait-object-macro-matcher.rs: the syntax error
is duplicated, because it occurs now when parsing the decl macro
input, and also when parsing the expanded decl macro. But this won't
show up for normal users due to error de-duplication.
- tests/ui/associated-consts/issue-93835.rs: similar, plus there are
some additional errors about this very broken code.
- The changes to metavariable descriptions in #132629 are now visible in
error message for several tests.
|
|
Much like the previous commit.
I think the removal of "the token" in each message is fine here. There
are many more error messages that mention tokens without saying "the
token" than those that do say it.
|
|
By using `token_descr`, as is done for many other errors, we can get
slightly better descriptions in error messages, e.g.
"macro expansion ignores token `let` and any following" becomes
"macro expansion ignores keyword `let` and any tokens following".
This will be more important once invisible delimiters start being
mentioned in error messages -- without this commit, that leads to error
messages such as "error at ``" because invisible delimiters are
pretty printed as an empty string.
|
|
We are moving toward forbidding `missing_fragment_specifier` either in
edition 2024 or unconditionally. Make a first step toward this by
ensuring crates that rely on the old behavior are reported when used as
dependencies.
Tracking issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128143>
|
|
Go over all structured parser suggestions and make them verbose style.
When suggesting to add or remove delimiters, turn them into multiple suggestion parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parsing now accepts a match arm without a body, so we must make sure to
only accept that if the pattern is a never pattern.
|
|
Because a macro invocation can expand to a never pattern, we can't rule
out a `arm!(),` arm at parse time. Instead we detect that case at
expansion time, if the macro tries to output a pattern followed by `=>`.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Adrian <adrian.iosdev@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
