| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-10 | Show diff suggestion format on verbose replacement | Esteban Küber | -6/+9 | |
| ``` error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields --> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15 | LL | let _ = 2.l; | ^ | help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix | LL - let _ = 2.l; LL + let _ = 2.0f64; | ``` | ||||
| 2024-07-12 | Make parse error suggestions verbose and fix spans | Esteban Küber | -1/+6 | |
| Go over all structured parser suggestions and make them verbose style. When suggesting to add or remove delimiters, turn them into multiple suggestion parts. | ||||
| 2024-05-02 | Stabilize exclusive_range | Ross Smyth | -15/+4 | |
| 2024-02-04 | Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolved | León Orell Valerian Liehr | -5/+56 | |
| 2024-01-13 | Bless tests | George-lewis | -0/+1 | |
| Update tests | ||||
| 2023-11-17 | On resolve error of `[rest..]`, suggest `[rest @ ..]` | Esteban Küber | -0/+30 | |
| When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest `X @ ..` as an alternative. ``` error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope --> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13 | LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | ^^^^ not found in this scope | help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator | LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | + ``` Fix #88404. | ||||
