about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/ui/pattern/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.stderr
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-02-10Show diff suggestion format on verbose replacementEsteban Küber-6/+9
``` error[E0610]: `{integer}` is a primitive type and therefore doesn't have fields --> $DIR/attempted-access-non-fatal.rs:7:15 | LL | let _ = 2.l; | ^ | help: if intended to be a floating point literal, consider adding a `0` after the period and a `f64` suffix | LL - let _ = 2.l; LL + let _ = 2.0f64; | ```
2024-07-12Make parse error suggestions verbose and fix spansEsteban Küber-1/+6
Go over all structured parser suggestions and make them verbose style. When suggesting to add or remove delimiters, turn them into multiple suggestion parts.
2024-05-02Stabilize exclusive_rangeRoss Smyth-15/+4
2024-02-04Suggest `[tail @ ..]` on `[..tail]` and `[...tail]` where `tail` is unresolvedLeón Orell Valerian Liehr-5/+56
2024-01-13Bless testsGeorge-lewis-0/+1
Update tests
2023-11-17On resolve error of `[rest..]`, suggest `[rest @ ..]`Esteban Küber-0/+30
When writing a pattern to collect multiple entries of a slice in a single binding, it is easy to misremember or typo the appropriate syntax to do so, instead writing the experimental `X..` pattern syntax. When we encounter a resolve error because `X` isn't available, we suggest `X @ ..` as an alternative. ``` error[E0425]: cannot find value `rest` in this scope --> $DIR/range-pattern-meant-to-be-slice-rest-pattern.rs:3:13 | LL | [1, rest..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | ^^^^ not found in this scope | help: if you meant to collect the rest of the slice in `rest`, use the at operator | LL | [1, rest @ ..] => println!("{rest:?}"), | + ``` Fix #88404.