about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/tests/ui/traits/const-traits/auxiliary
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-06-26Change const trait bound syntax from ~const to [const]Oli Scherer-12/+12
2025-06-16aux: add `{Meta,Pointee}Sized` bounds to minicoreDavid Wood-25/+25
With `MetaSized` bounds replacing `?Sized` and being added as a supertrait, the same relaxations applied to the standard library must be applied to minicore.
2025-06-16aux: add `{Meta,Pointee}Sized` to minicoreDavid Wood-1/+8
Add `MetaSized` and `PointeeSized` to minicore so that fewer tests fail from missing language items.
2025-01-14Enforce syntactical stability of const traits in HIRMichael Goulet-0/+1
2025-01-04rustc_intrinsic: support functions without body; they are implicitly marked ↵Ralf Jung-5/+1
as must-be-overridden
2024-12-22Flatten effects directory now that it doesn't really test anything specificMichael Goulet-0/+486
2024-11-03Yeet effects featureMichael Goulet-4/+2
2024-10-25Re-do recursive const stability checksRalf Jung-0/+9
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions: 1. const-stable functions 2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions 3. functions that can make use of unstable const features This PR implements the following system: - `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions. - `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category. - `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls. Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed. There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be `rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special case so IMO it's fine. The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked), it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or `#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply const-stability. Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]` functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding `#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]` functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No other attributes are required.
2024-10-22Move testsMichael Goulet-0/+46