1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
/*!
* A functional key,value store that works on anything.
*
* This works using a binary search tree. In the first version, it's a
* very naive algorithm, but it will probably be updated to be a
* red-black tree or something else.
*
* This is copied and modified from treemap right now. It's missing a lot
* of features.
*/
use core::cmp::{Eq, Ord};
use core::option::{Some, None};
use core::prelude::*;
pub type Treemap<K, V> = @TreeNode<K, V>;
enum TreeNode<K, V> {
Empty,
Node(@K, @V, @TreeNode<K, V>, @TreeNode<K, V>)
}
/// Create a treemap
pub fn init<K, V>() -> Treemap<K, V> { @Empty }
/// Insert a value into the map
pub fn insert<K:Copy + Eq + Ord,V:Copy>(m: Treemap<K, V>, k: K, v: V)
-> Treemap<K, V> {
@match m {
@Empty => Node(@k, @v, @Empty, @Empty),
@Node(@copy kk, vv, left, right) => {
if k < kk {
Node(@kk, vv, insert(left, k, v), right)
} else if k == kk {
Node(@kk, @v, left, right)
} else { Node(@kk, vv, left, insert(right, k, v)) }
}
}
}
/// Find a value based on the key
pub fn find<K:Eq + Ord,V:Copy>(m: Treemap<K, V>, k: K) -> Option<V> {
match *m {
Empty => None,
Node(@ref kk, @copy v, left, right) => {
if k == *kk {
Some(v)
} else if k < *kk { find(left, k) } else { find(right, k) }
}
}
}
/// Visit all pairs in the map in order.
pub fn traverse<K, V: Copy>(m: Treemap<K, V>, f: &fn(&K, &V)) {
match *m {
Empty => (),
/*
Previously, this had what looked like redundant
matches to me, so I changed it. but that may be a
de-optimization -- tjc
*/
Node(@ref k, @ref v, left, right) => {
traverse(left, f);
f(k, v);
traverse(right, f);
}
}
}
|
