blob: a6d5d60fbf05b8affca4784d2db86d5bcf79f101 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
error: consider using an `AtomicBool` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:7:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(true);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_atomic)]`
error: consider using an `AtomicUsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:10:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(5usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicIsize` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:13:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(9isize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:17:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:20:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicU32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:23:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::mutex_integer)]`
error: consider using an `AtomicI32` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:26:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicU8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:30:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0u8);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicI16` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:33:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0i16);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicI8` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:36:25
|
LL | let _x: Mutex<i8> = Mutex::new(0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: consider using an `AtomicI64` instead of a `Mutex` here; if you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`
--> tests/ui/mutex_atomic.rs:40:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(X);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 11 previous errors
|
